Distribution of the compression and expansion of morbidity in 194 countries and territories, 1990–2016: The role of income inequality

He Chen,Jing Ning,Hongwei Hu,Haochen Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-740218/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background Compression and expansion of morbidity are two critical hypotheses to analyze the relationship among morbidity, disability, and mortality. This study aims to analyze the global distribution of the compression and expansion of morbidity and to investigate its relationship with income inequality. Methods Data was from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and Standardized World Income Inequality Database, version 8.2. Seven types of health changes were defined. Income inequality was measured with Gini coefficient index. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the association of income inequality with the compression and expansion of morbidity. Results All the seven types of the compression and expansion of morbidity exist in the world, despite their uneven distribution. The relative expansion of morbidity with increased or constant life expectancy (Type 6) was the most popular type occurring to more than half of populations in the last quarter of century, which was followed by the relative compression of morbidity with increased or constant LE (Type 3, 30.71%). The income inequality was significantly associated with the health changes, which still held after controlling a variety of confounders and in robustness tests. Those societies with lower income inequality were more likely to incur Type 3. Conclusions It is necessary to distinguish the positive and negative changes in life expectancy when examing the compression and expansion of morbidity. The increasing popularity of Type 6 implies higher needs for health and social care. Measures to reduce income inequality or mitigate its negative influence on health changes might promote the occurrence of Type 3.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?