Abstract:Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients frequently receive combination chemotherapy treatment, but a direct comparison of response to carboplatin, docetaxel, and their combination in 50 TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) showed that combination treatment was largely ineffective at generating enhanced responses over the best single agent. This suggests de-escalation of chemotherapy may be possible if molecular mechanisms and biomarkers underlying response to individual treatments can be identified. To this end, we performed multi-omics profiling for the 50 TNBC PDXs. Methods: Orthotopic TNBC PDXs were treated with four weekly cycles of docetaxel, carboplatin, or the combination. Changes in tumor volume after 4 weeks of treatment were assessed quantitatively and by modified RECIST criteria. Genomic, transcriptomic, and mass-spectrometry-based proteomic profiling were performed on baseline tumors prior to treatments to identify associations with chemotherapy response at the gene and pathway level. ProMS was used to integrate both RNA and protein data to select a 5 RNA feature combination for optimized prediction of carboplatin response in a logistic regression model. Publicly available neoadjuvant chemotherapy clinical datasets with transcriptomic data and response information used for validation/testing included TNBC samples from: GSE18864, I-SPY2 (GSE194040), and BrighTNess (GSE164458). Results: Proteogenomic profiles revealed distinct genes associated with response to each agent and their combination, respectively, suggesting distinct molecular mechanisms underlying response to each treatment. A substantial number of genes associated with single agent and combination treatment were validated in multiple independent patient cohorts receiving platinum and taxane containing neoadjuvant therapy, confirming clinical relevance of our PDX panel. For the same treatment, different types of molecular data identified distinct sets of associated genes, providing highly complementary information. At the pathway level, RNA and protein data converged to metabolic and E2F/G2M related pathways which were upregulated in PDXs resistant or responsive to all treatment types, respectively, while variable levels of MYC-related proliferation pathways were observed across all treatments suggesting pathways that are common across and unique to different treatments. Several individual genes found to be higher in PDXs with better response to either single-agent had discriminatory power in external clinical TNBC datasets treated with similar neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. In addition, a logistic regression-based carboplatin response prediction model trained to select a group of 5 RNA markers (TKT, MAGI2, ATF6B, MCM7, LRP6) using both RNA and protein data performed the best in predicting response to cisplatin in a clinical TNBC dataset vs predicting response to other datasets with taxane and platinum + taxane combination containing chemotherapy regimens, demonstrating specificity of the prediction model. These results suggest potential individual biomarkers or biomarker combinations to select TNBC tumors that may respond to either single agent carboplatin, docetaxel, or their combination. PDXs refractory to all treatment arms had higher levels of proteostasis-related pathways including proteasome degradation and the unfolded protein response (UPR) related to endoplasmic reticulum stress and altered levels of chromatin regulation. Subsequent pharmacological targeting of the UPR pathway and targeting HDACs enhanced chemotherapy response. Conclusion: Proteogenomic characterization identifies molecular mechanisms and putative biomarkers for stratifying TNBC tumors for single or combination chemotherapy treatments, suggests targeted therapies to augment chemotherapy response, and provides a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Chen Huang, Ramakrishnan R. Srinivasan, Suhas Vasaikar, Lacey E. Dobrolecki, Alaina N. Lewis, Na Zhao, Jin Cao, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar Rimawi, Matthew J. Ellis, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander B. Saltzman, Anna Malovannaya, John D. Landua, Bo Wen, Antrix Jain, Gerburg M. Wulf, Shunqiang Li, Daniel C. Kraushaar, Tao Wang, Xi Chen, Gloria V. Echeverria, Meenakshi Anurag, Bing Zhang, Michael T. Lewis. Patient-derived xenografts allow deconvolution of single agent and combination chemotherapy responses in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-23-01.

Integrated Metabolic and Gene Expression Profiling Reveals New Therapeutic Modalities for Rapidly Proliferating Breast Cancers

Integrated Metabolic Profiling and Transcriptional Analysis Reveals Therapeutic Modalities for Targeting Rapidly Proliferating Breast Cancers

Integrated Metabolic Profiling and Gene Expression Analysis Reveals Therapeutic Modalities in Breast Cancer

Abstract P2-23-01: Patient-derived Xenografts Allow Deconvolution of Single Agent and Combination Chemotherapy Responses in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract P5-05-01: Metabolite profiling and RNA-seq identifies novel metabolomic-genomic biomarker and therapeutic options for rapidly proliferating breast cancers

Comprehensive metabolomics expands precision medicine for triple-negative breast cancer

Integrative Analysis of Metabolic Subtypes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Strategies

Pharmacologic profiling of patient-derived xenograft models of primary treatment-naïve triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Analysis Based on Metabolic Gene Classification and Immunotherapy

Identifying Personalized Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer

Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Enable Deconvolution and Prediction of Chemotherapy Responses

Heterogeneity and potential therapeutic insights for triple-negative breast cancer based on metabolic‐associated molecular subtypes and genomic mutations

Abstract P5-07-01: Proteogenomic analysis of differential chemotherapy responses in patient-derived xenografts of triple-negative breast cancer

Comprehensive analysis of the metabolomics and transcriptomics uncovers the dysregulated network and potential biomarkers of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Multi-omic analysis identifies metabolic biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer and therapeutic response prediction

Metabolic Imaging as a Tool to Characterize Chemoresistance and Guide Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Metabolic-Pathway-Based Subtyping of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Reveals Potential Therapeutic Targets

Abstract PS03-02: Single-cell metabolic profiling uncovers new precision immunotherapy strategy in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract LB-107: Targeting the Glycolytic Pathway As an Effective Therapeutic Approach for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Precision unveiled: Synergistic genomic landscapes in breast cancer—Integrating single‐cell analysis and decoding drug toxicity for elite prognostication and tailored therapeutics

Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy