Mini-CEX Oriented Attending Physician Rounds (Mini-Cex-apr): A New Teaching Model for Standardized Residency Training

Xin Liu,Weixian Xu,Haiyun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-746506/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Background: Mini-CEX is a multifunctional tool to accurately evaluate and improve the clinical competence of residents. It is crucial to explore an appropriate way to combine mini-CEX and clinical practice in order to achieve wide application of mini-CEX in Chinese residency training programs. Objectives: This study was designed to explore the value of mini-CEX oriented attending physician rounds in residency training for cardiology and gastroenterology residents.Design: Single-blind, RCT.Methods: Participants were randomly assigned into the traditional and the mini-CEX-APR group. The traditional group received regular training required by the education department, while the mini-CEX-APR group received additional mini-CEX oriented attending physician rounds on the basis of routine training. The attending physicians in the mini-CEX-APR group conducted real-time evaluation of residents in the process of ward rounds based on the mini-CEX, and provided timely feedback and targeted guidance every 2 weeks. All subjects accepted final mini-CEX assessment when they finished the cardiology or gastroenterology training. Results: The mini-CEX scores of the mini-CEX-APR group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group (50.05±3.19 vs 45.65±3.14, P<0.001), especially in history taking (7.54±0.63 vs 6.60±0.62, P<0.001) and integrated capacity parts (7.46±0.60 vs 6.61±0.59, P<0.001), their satisfaction levels are also higher than those in traditional group (8.81±0.77 vs 7.28±0.67, P<0.001). The overall teaching effect of the mini-CEX-APR was better than traditional teaching methods regardless of in the Grade III-A (51.35±2.69 vs 46.76±2.77, P<0.001) or Grade III-B hospitals (48.67±3.14 vs 44.50±3.12, P<0.001).Conclusion: The mini-CEX-APR model that integrates evaluation and feedback organically can enhance the scientific nature of the clinical evaluation, and especially promote the elevation of residents’ clinical capabilities. Its excellent reliability, validity, versatility and convenience will be a renewed push for incorporating the mini-CEX-APR into residency training.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?