Global Cognitive Function is Associated with Sex, Educational Level, Occupation Type, and the Speech Recognition Rate in Older Chinese Adults: A Single-Center, Prospective, Cross- Sectional Study

Hailing Gu,Xinyi Yao,Cong Diao,Min Liu,Weili Kong,Haotian Liu,Yun Zheng,Zhaoli Meng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1322769/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: The development of cognitive impairment may be delayed if its risk factors are identified, it can be detected, its developmental trend can be predicted, and early intervention can be performed. This study primarily aimed to investigate the association between global cognitive function and hearing loss, educational level, and occupation type, and to determine any differences in such associations according to sex among older Chinese adults. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively recruited individuals in one ear, nose, and throat outpatient clinic who were above 55 years of age and could write independently, with no diagnosis of severe vision impairment. Audiometric examinations included otoscopy, acoustic immittance, pure-tone audiometry, and speech audiometry for each ear. Cognitive function was evaluated by using the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Univariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between each variable and MMSE score. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between variables and MMSE scores after adjusting for independent variables that were statistically significant in the univariable analyses. Results: We enrolled 219 individuals, including 98 men (mean ± standard deviation age, 63.08±6.64 years) and 121 women (62.64±7.17 years). The overall MMSE scores of the normal hearing and mild, moderate, and severe-to-profound hearing loss groups were 24.53±3.10, 24.36±3.92, 23.32±3.88, and 20.92±6.53, respectively. MMSE scores were higher among participants with higher educational levels (p<0.001) and were significantly correlated with occupation type (p<0.001). MMSE scores were significantly higher in men than in women (p<0.001). However, upon analysis of the five subdomains, significant differences were only observed for attention and calculation (p<0.001) and language (p=0.011). We further explored whether educational level is related to the cognitive differences between the sexes by comparing the distribution of educational levels between men and women, with the chi-square test; there was no significant difference in educational level between the sexes (p=0.070). Conclusions: We discovered statistically significant relationships between global cognitive function and sex, educational level, and occupation type. Sex-specific strategies may be required to improve healthcare policies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?