Reduction in NOX emissions during the COVID-19 lockdown did not result in a comparable reduction in secondary PM levels

Vigneshkumar Balamurugan,Jia Chen,Zhen Qu,Xiao Bi,Frank N. Keutsch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-9565
2022-01-01
Abstract:<p>The COVID-19 lockdown is viewed as a natural experiment that can put our current understanding of the contribution of secondary PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources to the test. In ten German metropolitan areas, mean meteorology-accounted for PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations dropped by 5 % during the 2020 lockdown period (spring) compared to 2019, but meteorology-accounted for NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations decreased by 23 % during the same time. Furthermore, meteorology-accounted for SO<sub>2</sub> and CO concentrations show no significant differences between the 2020 lockdown period and 2019. The GEOS-Chem model simulation with COVID-19 emission reduction scenario (23 % reduction in NO<sub>X</sub> emission with unchanged VOC and SO2) supports our findings of only a marginal decrease in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and a significant decrease in NO<sub>2</sub> levels and reveals that the atmosphere's oxidative capacity is increased in all three important oxidants, OH, O<sub>3</sub>, and night-time NO<sub>3</sub>. The night-time increase in O<sub>3 </sub>is the main cause of increase in night-time NO<sub>3</sub> radical. The increase in OH does not compensate for the strong reductions in NO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the increase in NO<sub>3</sub> radical at night roughly balances the effects of the NO<sub>2</sub> reduction. As a result, compared to the Business As Usual condition, i.e., no lockdown, day-time PM nitrates are reduced while night-time PM nitrate formation is relatively unaffected. In addition to the above, slightly enhanced sulfate formation and decreased ammonium explain the small reduction in the total PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the lockdown period. We also investigated the annual spring high PM<sub>2.5</sub> episodes in German metropolitan areas. Satellite measurements show high ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) concentrations in the early spring and summer months, when high PM<sub>2.5</sub> episodes are associated with high NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations in the spring. We find that high atmospheric ammonia concentrations, combined with low temperature and low boundary layer height, are the most favorable conditions for PM<sub>2.5</sub> formation. Based on our findings, we suggest that emission control policies should be more focused on limiting ozone that should also reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Furthermore, ammonia emissions should be limited in order to control the high PM<sub>2.5</sub> episodes in winter and spring.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?