Abstract:Objective To compare the corneal biomechanical properties between keratoconic eyes and normal eyes by using corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST),and to evaluate the diagnostic value of corneal biomechanical parameters based on Corvis ST in keratoconus.Methods A prospective cases-control study was performed.Twenty-four keratoconic eyes from 17 patients and 40 normal eyes (right eye) from 40 participants were enrolled from October to December in Peking University First Hospital.Anterior segment parameters and refractive diopters were obtained with Topography (TMS-4) and mydriatic refraction.Biomechanical parameters were assessed with Corvis ST.Independent sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare the parameters of the two groups.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to distinguish keratoconus from the normal cornea.Diagnostic efficacies of all parameters were analyzed and some parameters were used as independent variables to establish a Logistic regression model.Results Maximum deformation amplitude of highest concavity (HCDA),maximum corneal velocity during the second applanation (Vout) and distance between both non-deformed peaks (PD) in the keratoconus group were higher than those in the normal control group,and first applanation time (A1T),cord length of first applanation (ALL),cord length of second applanation (A2L),radius value of central concave curvature at highest concavity (HCR) were lower than those in the normal control group,with significant differences between the two groups (all at P＜0.05).Maximum corneal velocity during the first applanation (Vin),second applanation time (A2T) and time taken to reach highest concavity (HCT) were insignificantly different between the two groups (all at P＞0.05).Many parameters had diagnostic values in keratoconus assessed by ROC analysis.HCR was the most efficient parameter showed by ROC evaluation (area under the curve was 0.927,sensitivity was 95.8％,specificity was 82.5％).The Logistic model were established with two independent variables,HCR (OR=0.205) and central corneal thickness (CCT) (OR=0.970).The forecast model of keratoconus diagnosis was established as follows:Logistic (P) =23.47-1.59×HCR-0.30×CCT.Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were enhanced by using this model,the sensitivity was 95.8％,and the specificity was 95.0％.Conclnsions It is useful to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties with Corvis ST.HCR is an efficient auxiliary testing index of diagnosis or screening of keratoconus.

Corneal Deformation Response in Patients With keratoconus and in Healthy Subjects

Single-cell atlas of keratoconus corneas revealed aberrant transcriptional signatures and implicated mechanical stretch as a trigger for keratoconus pathogenesis

Clinical Features of 233 Cases of Keratoconus

Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes

Research of diagnostic value of corneal biomechanical parameters based on Corvis ST in keratoconus

A compare study on cornea biomechanical properties in normal and keratoconic eyes

Comparison of bilateral differential characteristics of corneal biomechanics between keratoconus and normal eyes

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Between Post-LASIK Ectasia and Primary Keratoconus

Relationship among Corneal Stiffness, Thickness, and Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in Keratoconus

Changes in corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes with various severities after corneal cross-linking (CXL): A comparative study

Correlation Between Corneal Topographic, Densitometry, and Biomechanical Parameters in Keratoconus Eyes

Evaluation of central corneal thickness in keratoconus and normal corneas during air puff indentation

A Potential Screening Index of Corneal Biomechanics in Healthy Subjects, Forme Fruste Keratoconus Patients and Clinical Keratoconus Patients

Corneal biomechanical outcome of collagen cross-linking in keratoconic patients evaluated by Corvis ST

Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages

Comparative study of the corneal morphological characteristics of keratoconus evaluated using CASIA2, Sirius, and Pentacam

Cornea Confocal Microscopy Study of Patients with Preclinical Keratoconus

Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects

Air-puff induced corneal dynamics in normal, forme fruste and keratoconic eyes measured with OCT-based optical biometry

A New Biomechanical Deformation Response Parameter: Change in Central Corneal Thickness During Air Puff Induced Corneal Deformation

Corneal Surface Elevation and Thickness in Relation to the Fit of Rigid Contact Lenses in Keratoconus and After Corneal Cross-Linking