Abstract:Objective: In research, and particularly clinical trials, it is important to identify persons at high risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), such as those with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). However, not all persons with this diagnosis have a high risk of AD as MCI can be broken down further into amnestic MCI (aMCI), who have a high risk specifically for AD, and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), who are predominantly at risk for other dementias. People with aMCI largely differ from healthy controls and naMCI on memory tasks as it is the hallmark criteria for an amnestic diagnosis. Given the growing use of the NIH Toolbox Cognition battery in research trials, this project investigated which Toolbox Cognition measures best differentiated aMCI from naMCI and in comparison to persons with normal cognition. Participants and Methods: A retrospective data analysis was conducted investigating performance on NIH Toolbox Cognition tasks among 199 participants enrolled in the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. All participants were over age 50 (51-89 years, M=70.64) and had a diagnosis of aMCI (N=74), naMCI (N=24), or Normal Cognition (N=101). Potential demographic differences were investigated using chi-square and ANOVAs. Repeated measure general linear model was used to look at potential group differences in Toolbox Cognition performance, covarying for age which was statistically different in aMCI versus Normal participants. Linear regression was used to determine which cognitive abilities, as measured by the Uniform Data Set-3 (UDS3), might contribute to Toolbox differences noted in naMCI versus aMCI groups. Results: As expected, aMCI had lower Toolbox memory scores compared to naMCI (p=0.007) and Normals (p<0.001). Interestingly, naMCI had lower Oral Reading scores than both aMCI (p=0.008) and Normals (p<0.001). There were no other Toolbox performance differences between the MCI groups. 19.4% of the variance in Oral Reading scores was explained by performance on the following UDS3 measures: Benson delayed recall (inverse relationship) and backward digit span and phonemic fluency (positive relationship). Conclusions: In this study, Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory and Oral Reading scores differentiated aMCI and naMCI groups. While the difference in memory was expected, it was surprising that the naMCI group performed worse than the aMCI and normal groups on the Toolbox Oral Reading task, a task presumed to reflect Crystalized abilities resistive to cognitive decline. Results suggest that Oral Reading is primarily positively associated with working memory and executive tasks from the UDS3, but negatively associated with visual memory. It is possible that the Oral Reading subtest is sensitive to domains of deficit aside from memory that can best distinguish aMCI from naMCI. A better understanding of the underlying features in the Oral Reading task will assist in better characterizing deficit patterns seen in naMCI, making selection of aMCI participants more effective in clinical trials.

Cognitive Features of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Specific Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Test Scores

Memory Tests Predict the Change of Hippocampus Topography in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients

Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): A Factor Analytic Study of a Large Sample of Normal Elderly Volunteers

Neurocognitive Features of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Distress Symptoms in Older Adults Without Major Depression

Detection of Visual Memory and Learning Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease Using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery

Subtle cognitive deficits assessed by means of CANTAB in a cohort of subjects with CSF AD profile

Does the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) Distinguish Between Cognitive Domains in Healthy Older Adults?

Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the Thai Version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Tests: A Multivariate and Machine Learning Study.

A systematic review of the diagnostic test accuracy of brief cognitive tests to detect amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Diagnostic Performance of a Tablet Computer-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Identification of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Neural Correlates of Object Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Evidence of practice effect in CANTAB spatial working memory test in a cohort of patients with mild cognitive impairment

77 Differentiating Amnestic Versus Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

Hippocampal dysfunction in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A functional neuroimaging study of a visuospatial paired associates learning task

Preclinical Detection and Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Using a Visuospatial Paired Associates Learning Test (CANTAB PAL): Implications for Screening and Clinical Trial Sample Enrichment

Memory Deficits for Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Utility of CANTAB in functional neuroimaging

Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): utility and validation

Detecting Dementia: Novel Neuropsychological Markers of Preclinical Alzheimer&rsquo;s Disease

Automated Detection of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults: A Combined Spatial Atrophy and White Matter Alteration Approach

Identifying Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care