Myostatin/activin pathway gene expression and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Karam Ashouri,Yan Yang,Joshua Millstein,Sebastian Stintzing,Aparna Raj Parikh,Shivani Soni,Sandra Algaze,Pooja Mittal,Priya Jayachandran,Alexandra Wong,Lesly Torres-Gonzalez,Wu Zhang,Federico Innocenti,Alan P. Venook,Christoph Mancao,Chiara Cremolini,Volker Heinemann,Francesca Battaglin,Heinz-Josef Lenz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.188
IF: 45.3
2024-01-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:188 Background: Cancer cachexia leads to reduced overall survival (OS) in mCRC. Novel therapeutics targeting the myostatin/activin pathway can reverse cachexia. Here we investigate the effect of myostatin/activin pathway gene expression and SNPs in mCRC patients (pts). Methods: Blood samples from 836 pts enrolled in 3 randomized first-line trials: TRIBE (FOLFIRI bevacizumab [bev]; FOLFOXIRI bev), FIRE-3 (FOLFIRI bev; FOLFIRI cetuximab [cet]) and MAVERICC (FOLFIRI bev; FOLFOX bev) were genotyped by Illumina OncoArray. The impact on outcome of 13 SNPs from 5 myostatin/activin genes ( ACVR1B, ACVR2A, ACVR2B, MSTN, INHBA) was tested. Gene expression analysis included 433 mCRC pts treated with either bev (n = 226) or cet (n = 207) in combination with first-line chemotherapy from the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial (NCT00265850). RNA isolated from FFPE tumor samples were sequenced with HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared by gene expression tertiles: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). Logrank test was used for univariate (UV) analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression for multivariate (MV). Results: Pts with the germline G/G variant of ACVR2B rs2276541 had worse PFS (FIRE-3 bev: 9.7 vs 12.2 months [mo]; UV P = .044, MV P = .027; HR 2.10, 95%CI 1.13 - 3.38 & FIRE-3 cet: 7.6 vs 13.2 mo; UV P = .047; HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.00 - 2.72) and tumor response (TRIBE FOLFIRI bev: 48 vs 61%, MV P = .035) compared to any A carriers. Rs3749387 C/C variant in the same gene showed longer OS (MAVERICC FOLFOX bev: 36.9 vs 24.3 mo; MV P = .005; HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.80) and PFS (MAVERICC FOLFIRI bev: 14.5 vs 11.8 mo; MV P = .009; HR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.32-0.88) relative to G variants. Any C allele in ACVR2A rs10497025 demonstrated improved OS (MAVERICC FOLFOX bev: 25.5 vs 11.9 mo; HR = 2.38, UV P = .035; 95%CI 1.03- 5.50 & TRIBE FOLFIRI bev: 26.9 vs 22.4 mo; UV P = .017; HR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.11-3.26) and PFS (FIRE-3 - FOLFIRI cet : 32.1 vs 12.2 mo; UV P = .047; HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.22-1.02 & MAVERICC FOLFOX bev 11.0 vs 6.8 mo; UV P = .006; HR = 2.52, 95%CI 1.26-5.00) relative to G/G. Tumor ACVR1B-H expression was associated with longer PFS (L/M/H, 9.5 vs 10.9 vs 13.5 mo, UV P = .034) and OS (L/M/H, 25.0 vs 28.2 vs 38.6 mo, UV P < .001) in all treated pts. ACVR1B-H also conferred improved OS in treatment subgroups (L/M/H; cet: 21.0 vs 27.4 vs 40.3 mo, UV P < .001; bev: 25.9 vs 29.0 vs 36.9 mo, UV P = .025). ACVR2B-L correlated with worse PFS (L/M/H, 10.3 vs 12.2 vs 11.2 mo, UV P = .043) and OS (L/M/H, 24.7 vs 33.8 vs 34.9 mo; P = .006) in the overall cohort. This association held true in cet treated patients (OS 21.2 vs 35.8 vs 37.1 mo; UV P < .001) but not bev. Conclusions: Our results suggest a role of cachexia SNPs and gene expression as a prognostic marker for mCRC undergoing first line treatment. These biomarkers may enable targeted treatments for cancer cachexia and support exploring this approach in combination with standard therapy in selected pts.
oncology