Body mass index and paraspinal muscle on sagittal spino-pelvic alignment and balance in patients with degenerative kyphosis: a case-control study

Yan Liang,Shuai Xu,Zhenqi Zhu,Chen Guo,Haiying Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1827404/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Objective To characterize the distribution of paraspinal muscle in degenerative kyphosis (DK) and identify the impact of body mass index (BMI) and paraspinal muscle on sagittal alignment and balance status.Summary of Background Data The relationship between sagittal alignment, BMI and paraspinal muscle in DK remains unidentified and the available methods for paraspinal muscle measurement are complex. It is assumed that the relationship between muscle and kyphotic severity can be characterized with a simplified procedure.Methods Degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) or loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) was defined as DK group (81 cases), and 60 volunteers composed control group well-matched to DK group in terms of age and gender. DK was evaluated by TLK and LL; paraspinal muscle was depicted by lumbar crossing indentation value (LCIV) on T2-MRI; sagittal balance for DK was evaluated by pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT). For DK patients, normal-weight, overweight and obesity were defined based on BMI. For balance status, lumbo-pelvic balance (SB1) and imbalance (SIB1) depicted by PI-LL and pelvic balance (SB2) and retroversion (SIB2) expressed by PT were both defined.Results The mean LCIV (mLCIV) in DK group was smaller, and LCIV increased from T12-L1 to L4-L5 in DK group (P <0.01). In DK group, mLCIV in normal-weight subgroup was smaller than that in obesity subgroup (P <0.05). The mLCIV in DTLK only subgroup was larger compared to other 2 subgroups (P <0.05). In DK group, mLCIV was positively correlated with BMI and LL, and BMI and LL were influencing factors of mLCIV in DK group. The mLCIV was larger in SB1 group, while TLK and LCIV were predictors for PI-LL in DK patients. The mLCIV was also larger in SB2 group and LL was an independent predictor for PT in DK patients. Conclusions: LCIV is smaller in DK group while larger in sagittal balance status. LCIV, but not BMI, is correlated with sagittal alignment. This concept simplifies the primay diagnosis of DK group and plays a substantial role in maintaining the sagittal balance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?