Kant on Unconscious Mental Activity

Tom Rockmore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110265408.305

2012-01-01

Abstract:It is tempting but false to think that the unconscious was discovered at a given point in time when we suddenly became conscious of it. It is more accurate to say that long before that point, whenever it may be, it was not absent but present. Though we were unconscious of the unconscious as it were, it, however, understood in different ways, played a variable role in a large number of theories. Long before Freud focused on the unconscious in a way that has never ceased to capture the attention of the public, others, including philosophers, were interested directly and indirectly in the unconscious. Kant, who thinks of human beings as rational, emphasizes conscious activity. He believes that the Enlightenment culminates in the challenge to dare to know (sapere aude) in thinking independently of authority. He further believes that a moral individual must act autonomously, that is, according to principles that must without exception govern the actions of all rational beings. These are forms of conscious activity. But what if Kant s theory of knowledge were based on unconscious activity? This paper will examine Kant s epistemology in arguing that at the heart of the critical philosophy we find a conception of unconscious activity pointing to an anti-Cartesian theory of the subject as a conscious but also an unconscious actor.