Comparison of Thoracoscopic and Minimally Invasive Direct Left Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

张鲁锋,傅元豪,孟鲁豫,凌云鹏,冯海波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2022.11.003
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical data of patients who underwent thoracoscopic or minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery(LITA) harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods From January 2020 to June 2022, 38 patients underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgeries. LITA was harvested with thoracoscopic(n=18) or minimally invasive instruments(n=20), respectively. There were no significant differences in age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end diastolic dimension between the two groups(P>0.05). In the thoracoscopic group, LITA was obtained with the thoracoscopic instrument, and the coronary artery bypass grafting was completed with the minimally invasive heart stabilizer through a small incision in the left anterolateral chest without cardiopulmonary bypass, including 16 cases of single bypass grafting between LITA and the anterior descending artery, and 2 cases of multi coronary artery bypass grafting. In the minimally invasive group, 20 patients underwent bypass grafting with the anterior descending artery after obtaining LITA through a small anterolateral chest incision under direct vision. Results Among the 18 cases in the thoracoscopic group, LITA was successfully obtained in 16 cases, conversion to a small intercostal incision to obtain LITA under direct vision was required in 1 case, and the distal end was injured when obtaining the blood vessels under the thoracoscope in 1 case, with vascular anastomosis completed after repair through a small intercostal incision under direct vision. In the minimally invasive group, 20 patients were successfully obtained LITA and underwent bypass grafting. Compared with the minimally invasive group, patients in the thoracoscopic group showed advantages in postoperative mechanical ventilation time(4.9±2.0 h vs. 6.5±2.3 h, t=-2.318, P=0.026) and postoperative hospital length of stay(4.5±0.9 d vs. 5.3±0.8 d, t=-2.859, P=0.007). There were no differences in perioperative red blood cell transfusion and ICU length of stay(P>0.05). Postoperative coronary angiography or CTA showed 100% graft patency. Conclusion Thoracoscopic LITA harvesting shows comparable clinical result with minimally invasive technique and advantages in mechanical ventilation time and postoperative length of stay.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?