Abstract:OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) using a novel intraseptal technique to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND His bundle pacing to correct LBBB is a viable alternative approach to achieve CRT but is limited by suboptimal lead delivery and high thresholds. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter study performed between June 2017 and August 2018 at 6 centers. Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, complete LBBB, and left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) <= 50% who had indications for CRT and/or ventricular pacing in whom LBBP was attempted were included. Success rates, QRS duration, LVEF, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and improvement in functional class were assessed. RESULTS LBBP was successful in 61 of 63 patients (97%, mean age 68 +/- 11 years, 52.4% men). During LBBP, QRS duration narrowed from 169 +/- 16 to 118 +/- 12 ms (p < 0.001). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude remained stable at 1-year follow-up compared with implantation values (0.5 +/- 0.15 V/0.5 ms vs. 0.58 +/- 0.14 V/0.5 ms and 11.1 +/- 4.9 mV vs. 13.3 +/- 5.3 mV, respectively). LVEF increased significantly (33 +/- 8% vs. 55 1 10%; p < 0.001), with a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (123 +/- 61 ml vs. 67 39 ml; p < 0.001). LVEF had normalized (>= 50%) in 75% of patients at 1 year. New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly from 2.8 +/- 0.6 at baseline to 1.4 +/- 0.6 at 1 year. No deaths or heart failure hospitalizations were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS LBBP is a feasible and effective method for achieving electric resynchronization of LBBB, with resultant improvements in left ventricular structure and function. Low and stable pacing thresholds may be advantageous over His bundle paring for CRT in patients with LBBB and nonischemic cardiornyopathy. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Loss of Cardiac Resynchronization During DDD Pacing: What is the Mechanism?

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Pacing sites and modes in cardiac resynchronization therapy]

Advances in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

Effects of right atrial and ventricular DDD pacing on cardiac function and ventricular contraction synchrony

A Sudden Change in Pacing Rate: Normal or Malfunction?

Physiology of cardiac resynchronization

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Rate-Dependent Loss of Capture During Ventricular Pacing

Wide QRS Complex Arrhythmia with Alternating QRS Morphology: What Is the Mechanism?

Clinical observation of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator without routine defibrillation testing

Do patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block need biventricular pacing? A case of significant QRS narrowing by right ventricular pacing alone

Pacing induced cardiomyopathy: recognition and management

Physiology of biventricular pacing

An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

"Pacing Bigeminal".

Feasibility and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Study of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with DDD Pacemaker Implantation During Atrioventricular Conduction and Right Ventricular Apex Pacing Mode

Abstract 10177: Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Definition, Incidence, Risk Factors and Management