Cone-Opponent Ganglion Cells in the Primate Fovea Tuned to Non-Cardinal Color Directions
Tyler Godat,Kendall Kohout,Keith Parkins,Qiang Yang,Juliette E McGregor,William H Merigan,David R Williams,Sara S Patterson,Juliette E. McGregor,William H. Merigan,David R. Williams,Sara S. Patterson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1738-23.2024
2024-03-28
Abstract:A long-standing question in vision science is how the three cone photoreceptor types – long (L), medium (M) and short (S) wavelength sensitive – combine to generate our perception of color. Hue perception can be described along two opponent axes: red-green and blue-yellow. Psychophysical measurements of color appearance indicate that the cone inputs to the red-green and blue-yellow opponent axes are M vs. L+S and L vs. M+S, respectively. However, the “cardinal directions of color space” revealed by psychophysical measurements of color detection thresholds following adaptation are L vs. M and S vs. L+M. These cardinal directions match the most common cone-opponent retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the primate retina. Accordingly, the cone opponency necessary for color appearance is thought to be established in cortex. However, small populations with the appropriate M vs. L+S and L vs. M+S cone-opponency have been reported in large surveys of cone inputs to primate RGCs and their projections to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), yet their existence continues to be debated. Resolving this long-standing open question is necessary because a complete account of the cone-opponency in the retinal output is critical for efforts to understand how downstream neural circuits process color. Here, we performed adaptive optics calcium imaging to longitudinally, noninvasively measure foveal RGC light responses in the living macaque ( Macaca fascicularis ) eye. We confirm the presence of L vs. M+S and M vs. L+S neurons with non-cardinal cone-opponency and demonstrate that cone-opponent signals in the retinal output are more diverse than classically thought. Significance Statement Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) provide the only source of visual information to the brain and thus make up the building blocks for downstream visual processing. Accordingly, a complete account of how RGCs compare the cone photoreceptors is critical for understanding color vision. The cone inputs to the most common primate RGCs establish “cardinal directions” in color space that can explain color detection, but not color appearance. We identified foveal RGCs with non-cardinal cone opponency matching the signed cone inputs to red, green, blue and yellow. While this correlation does not imply causation, it opens new directions for understanding the neural processing of color. Our results indicate that the spectral information in the retinal output is more diverse than classically thought.
neurosciences