A Milestone in Methane Conversion

Bo-Qing Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwu036
IF: 20.6
2014-01-01
National Science Review
Abstract:Direct conversion of methane, the dominating component of natural and shale gases, into key chemical feedstock and liquid fuels has long been a big challenge in chemistry and chemical engineering [1, 2]. The industrial processes for methane-resourced higher hydrocarbons (e.g. olefin and gasoline) are based on indirect methane conversion integrating several catalytic reaction technologies. The production of syngas (a mixture of H2 and CO) by catalytic methane steam reforming over a supportedNi catalyst is always the first technology. The second is methanol synthesis from syngas using a supported Cu–ZnO catalyst. The third technology in the integration is methanol-to-olefin or methanolto-gasoline, employing zeolite-based catalysts. The syngas production is energy intensive and capital costing; the breaking of C–H bonds in methane has to be substantially reversed in the subsequent processes to produce olefins and fuels [3]. When the syngas conversion is devised instead to produce higher hydrocarbons, inevitable loss of carbon as CO2 would happen, leading to methane utilization efficiency no higher than 50%. As the smallest hydrocarbonmolecule in tetrahedron symmetry, methane holds the strongest C–H bond (434 kJ/mol) and the lowest polarizability. Suitable catalysts and oxidants (such as oxygen, halogens and water) are always desirable for the initiation (activation) and product selectivity control of its reaction [1–3]. Summarized in Fig. 1A are the presently known possibilities of direct methane conversion. Catalysts are the keys to these possibilities except the long-known energy-intensive high-temperature non-catalytic methane pyrolysis process for acetylene production (a). The discovery in the early 1980s of ethylene formation via oxidative coupling of methane over redox oxide
What problem does this paper attempt to address?