Ultrafine Particle Sources and In-Situ Formation in a European Megacity

M. Pikridas,J. Sciare,F. Freutel,S. Crumeyrolle,S.-L. von der Weiden-Reinmüller,A. Borbon,A. Schwarzenboeck,M. Merkel,M. Crippa,E. Kostenidou,M. Psichoudaki,L. Hildebrandt,G. J. Engelhart,T. Petäjä,A. S. H. Prévôt,F. Drewnick,U. Baltensperger,A. Wiedensohler,M. Kulmala,M. Beekmann,S. N. Pandis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-5663-2015

2015-01-01

Abstract:We have examined satellite-based products for fire identification, including small fires. No biomass burning events, significant enough to be identified by the algorithm used (Randerson et al., 2012), were observed during the two campaigns. Thus during summer biomass burning was ruled out as a potential source of error. On the other hand, during winter areas outside of the Paris plume with increased black carbon levels were identified and omitted from the analysis. The black carbon source in these cases was residential biomass burning. The particle number concentrations in these areas were relatively low though. The potential interference of these sources would have a modest to small effect on our estimates regarding the evolution of the Paris aerosol number plume. A new paragraph has been added in the revised manuscript discussing the above point.