Anaerobic biotransformation of roxarsone regulated by sulfate: Degradation, arsenic accumulation and volatilization

Rui Tang,Guangxue Wu,Zhengbo Yue,Wei Wang,Xinmin Zhan,Zhen-Hu Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115602

IF: 8.9

2020-12-01

Environmental Pollution

Abstract:<p>Roxarsone, an extensively used organoarsenical feed additive, is often pooled in livestock wastewater. Sulfate exists ubiquitously in livestock wastewater and is capable for arsenic remediation. However, little is known about impacts of sulfate on roxarsone biotransformation during anaerobic digestion of livestock wastewater. In this study, the biodegradation of 5.0 mg L⁻¹ roxarsone, and the accumulation and volatilization of the generated arsenical metabolites in a sulfate-spiked upflow anaerobic granular blanket reactor were investigated. Based on the analysis of degradation products, the nitro and arsenate groups of roxarsone were successively reduced to amino and arsenite groups before the C–As bond cleavage. Effluent arsenic concentration was ∼0.75 mg L⁻¹, of which 82.9–98.5% were organoarsenicals. The maximum arsenic volatilization rate reached 32.6 μg-As kg⁻¹-VS d⁻¹. Adding 5.0 mg L⁻¹ sulfate enabled 66.7% and 45.9% decrease in inorganic arsenic concentration and arsenic volatilization rate, respectively. Arsenic content in the anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) was accumulated to 1250 mg kg⁻¹ within 420 days. Based on the results of FESEM-EDS and XPS, sulfate addition induced arsenic precipitation in the AGS through the formation of orpiment. Arsenic in the effluent, biogas and AGS accounted for 52.9%, 0.01% and 47.1% of the influent arsenic when the reactor operated stably. The findings from this study suggest that sulfate has effectively regulatory effects on arsenic immobilization and volatilization during anaerobic digestion of organoarsenic-contaminated livestock wastewater.</p>

environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the ability and accuracy of surgeons in interpreting intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) images during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The study found that both surgical residents and experienced surgeons performed inadequately in interpreting normal, variant, and abnormal biliary anatomy. Specifically:

1. **Objective of the Study**: To evaluate the accuracy of surgeons in interpreting intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) images used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to investigate whether they use IOC routinely or selectively.

2. **Main Findings**:
- Only a few surgeons and residents could correctly identify IOC images showing normal biliary anatomy.
- Performance was similarly poor in identifying biliary anatomical variations.
- In contrast, surgeons performed much better in identifying abnormal biliary anatomy (e.g., injuries or other pathologies).
- The study also found no significant difference in the correct identification of biliary anatomy between routine and selective use of IOC.

3. **Conclusion**: The study indicates that regardless of the level of the surgeon, the accuracy in detecting normal and variant biliary anatomy is low. Improving the understanding of biliary anatomy among surgical operators may help enhance the accuracy of IOC image interpretation.

Through this study, the authors emphasize the importance of accurately understanding biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and suggest that improving surgeons' anatomical knowledge can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of IOC images. Additionally, the paper mentions other methods to prevent biliary injuries, such as adopting the "critical view of safety" or preoperative imaging studies.