Hemispheric surgery and outcomes of Sturge-Weber syndrome patients under 1 year old

王澍,赵萌,潘军红,王雄飞,张春生,马皓伟,王梦阳,李天富,王静,周健,刘长青,栾国明,关宇光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2021.08.004
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics, hemispheric surgical treatment, and outcomes of Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) patients under 1 year old, in order to provide guidance for treatment.Methods:A total of ten SWS children who underwent hemispheric surgery in Sanbo Brain Hospital from January 2009 to February 2018 were collected. Four patients received anatomical hemispherectomy (AH) and six received modified peri-insular hemispherotomy (MH). The seizure outcome was assessed following the International League against Epilepsy standard (ILAE) and the cognitive outcome was analyzed according to the Denver Developmental Screening Scale-Ⅱ(DDST).Results:The patients included ranged in age from 3 to 12 months, with an average of (8.10±3.44) months. Six patients met the surgical indications for drug resistant epilepsy with cognitive developmental abnormalities and/or motor dysfunction, and four met the surgical indications for ≥2 times of status epilepticus. After a 2-year follow-up, all of the children achieved ILAE 1 (seizure-free), and 70% of patients achieved cognitive improvement. There was no significant difference in outcomes between AH and MH (cognitive improvement: 83.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.500). MH was safer and less invasive than AH.Conclusion:Hemispheric surgery is safe and effective for SWS children under 1 year old in terms of both seizures and cognitive function. MH is a modified operation of the traditional AH, and it has similar outcomes with AH but is safer and minimally invasive.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?