On literary ethical criticism
ZZ Nie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7519.2005.01.002
2005-01-01
Abstract:This group of six papers makes respectively different approaches to literary ethical criticism. Professor Nie Zhenhao makes a pioneering and comprehensive exposition of the notion of literary ethical criticism, including its sources, methods, contents, foundations, the applicable areas, practical values and realistic significance. Professor Knut takes Ibsen′s plays for example to discuss not only the moralities in Ibsen′s plays, but also the necessity and importance of literary ethical criticism. Professor Wang Ning talks about Ecocriticism together with literary ethical criticism, providing a good example for combining literary ethical criticism with some other methods of literary criticism. Based on the three phases of human self-recognition and in a comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives, Professor Liu Jianjun makes a further interpretation of the ethical method in literary criticism. Professor Qiao Guoqiang speculates inquisitively the definition and ideological foundations of the ethical criticism. He also makes a conceptual debate over the authors, their literary works and their readers in terms of the critical method. Believing that it is three-dimensional and apocalyptical, Professor Zou Jianjun discusses the historical and realistic significances of the ethical method in literary criticism. In brief, all the above-mentioned papers attempt to state that in an era of moral invisibility in literary criticism, the critics should be responsible for moral re-establishment through literary criticism and therefore, to recover or retrieve the moral values in literature. They believe that literary ethical criticism is one of the most important approaches to achieving this end.