The Serum Osmolality Was Nonlinearly Associated with the Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality

Yihai Liu,Mingyue Wu,Jiayi Si,Lina Kang,Biao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4217730
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between both low and high osmolarity and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large general population.Methods: All participants were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2014. Baseline serum osmolality was determined from laboratory tests and cause of death from national death records. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality were estimated using Cox proportional regression analysis. The nonlinear relationship was explored using restricted cubic splines regression.Results: Among 40,679 individuals, 5029 (12.4%) died during a total of 3.26 thousand person-years of follow-up. Compared with the reference category (279~282 mmol/kg), the multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for all-cause mortality were 1.27 (1.16-1.40; P<0.001) in the lowest osmolality category (<201 mmol/kg) and 1.18 (1.09-1.28; P<0.001) in the highest osmolality category (>323 mmol/kg). Restricted cubic splines results showed that serum levels of osmolality had a U-shaped association with the risk of all-cause mortality, L-shaped relation with the risk of cardiovascular death, while a reverse J-shaped relationship with the risk of cancer death.Conclusions: Both low and high osmolality were predictive of increased all-cause mortality, supporting a U-shaped relationship. While serum osmolality was L-shaped related with the risk of cardiovascular death, and reverse J-shaped related with the risk of cancer death.Funding Information: None.Declaration of Interests: The authors have nothing to disclose regarding conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.Ethics Approval Statement: The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Center for Health Statistics and no new data was added.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?