CCM.G-K2 key comparison
Olivier Francis,Henri Baumann,Christian Ullrich,Stefaan Castelein,Michel Van Camp,Mauro Andrade de Sousa,Rodrigo Lima Melhorato,Chunjian Li,Jiang Xu,Duowu Su,Shuqing Wu,Hua Hu,Kang Wu,Gang Li,Zhe Li,Wen-Shyong Hsieh,Vojtech Pálinkás Pecný,Jakub Kostelecký,Jaakko Mäkinen,Jyri Näränen,Sébastien Merlet,Franck Pereira dos Santos,Pierre‐Yves Gillot,J. Hinderer,Jean-Daniel Bernard,Nicolas Le Moigne,Benjamin Fores,Olga Gitlein,Manuel Schilling,Reinhard Falk,H. Wilmes,Alessandro Germak,Emanuele Biolcati,Claudio Origlia,Domenico Iacovone,Francesco Baccaro,Shigeki Mizushima,Raphaël de Plaen,Gilbert Klein,Marc Seil,Remi Radinovic,Marcin Sękowski,Przemysław Dykowski,In-Mook Choi,Minseok Kim,Ana Borreguero,Sergio Sainz-Maza,Marta Calvo,Andreas Engfeldt,Jonas Ågren,René Reudink,Mark Eckl,Derek van Westrum,Ryan Billson,Brian Ellis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/1a/07009
2015-01-01
Metrologia
Abstract:In November 2013 an International Key Comparison, CCM.G-K2, was organized in the Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Walferdange. The comparison has assembled 25 participants coming from 19 countries and four different continents. The comparison was divided into two parts: the key comparison that included 10 NMIs or DIs, and the pilot study including all participants. The global result given by the pilot study confirms that all instruments are absolutely coherent to each other. The results obtained for the key comparison confirm a good agreement between the NMI instruments.