Abstract:The quantity–quality tradeoff theory implies that a reduction in fertility would induce more human capital investment per child, and it is widely believed that population control policy could promote human capital levels in developing countries. China's one-child policy (OCP) has significantly reduced the fertility in the country, and popular belief holds that this policy has contributed to the enhancement in China's human capital since 1979. However, the quantity–quality tradeoff dose not present the complete truth—another crucial factor relates to which segment of the population is reduced, a critical issue that has been ignored in the literature. China's OCP is significantly more strictly implemented in urban areas than in rural areas, where human capital investment in children is significantly lower. This two-tier OCP could have significantly increased the rural–urban fertility ratio and brought about important consequences. We first emphasize the importance of such a population compositional effect, which may offset the potentially positive quantity–quality tradeoff effect on human capital. We present a simple analytic framework and quantify the relative sizes of the quantity–quality tradeoff and compositional effects. We find that the former is dominated by the latter, and that the OCP has reduced the average human capital level of China's next generation by approximately 1–2%. This novel evidence indicates that the conventional wisdom on population control may be incomplete and that its policy implications could be misleading.

The Child Quantity–Quality Trade-Off

The Tradeoff Between Child Quality and Child Quantity in China:Use Quantile Regression Analysis

The Quantity-Quality Trade-off of Children in a Developing Country: Identification Using Chinese Twins

Quantity-quality trade-off in Northeast China during the Qing dynasty

Relaxed Population Policy, Family Size and Parental Investments in Children’s Education in Rural Northwestern China

Family Size, Birth Order, and Tests of the Quantity–quality Model

The Quantity-Quality Tradeoff of Children in a Developing Country: Identification Using Chinese Twins

Quantity-Quality Trade-Off And Early Childhood Development In Rural Family: Evidence From China'S Guizhou Province

Rationed Fertility: Theory and Evidence

Beyond the Quantity–Quality Tradeoff: Population Control Policy and Human Capital Investment

Population Policy, Family Size and Child Malnutrition in Vietnam – Testing the Trade-off Between Child Quantity and Quality from a Child Nutrition Perspective

The Unintended Consequences of Relaxing Birth Quotas: Theory and Evidence

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birthweight, and Chinaâ•Žs â•ŸOne Childâ•Ž Policy

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China's “One-Child” Policy

Occupational Variation in Quantity–Quality Trade-off in a Brawn-Based Economy

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birthweight, and China's 'one Child' Policy

Quality-Quantity Tradeoffs in Consumption

Education Gains Attributable to Fertility Decline: Patterns by Gender, Period, and Country in Latin America and Asia

GARY BECKER ON THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF CHILDREN

Economies of Scale, Resource Dilution and Education Choice in Developing Countries: Evidence from Chinese Households

The Effect of Family Size on Education: New Evidence from China's One Child Policy