Early Hospital Discharge on Day Two Post-Robotic Lobectomy with Telehealth Home Monitoring
Giuseppe Mangiameli,Edoardo Bottoni,Alberto Tagliabue,Veronica Maria Giudici,Alessandro Crepaldi,Alberto Testori,Emanuele Voulaz,Umberto Cariboni,Emanuela Re Cecconi,Matilde Luppichini,Marco Alloisio,Debora Brascia,Emanuela Morenghi,Giuseppe Marulli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206268
IF: 3.9
2024-10-22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: Despite the implementation of enhanced recovery programs, the reported average postoperative length of stay after robotic lobectomy remains as 4 days. In this prospective study, we present the outcomes of early discharge (on day 2) with telehealth home monitoring device after robotic lobectomy for lung cancer in selected patients. Methods: All patients with a caregiver were discharged on postoperative day 2 (POD 2) with a telemonitoring device provided they met the specific discharge criteria. Inclusion criteria: <75 years old, stage I-II NSCLC, with caregiver, ECOG 0–2, scheduled for lobectomy, logistic proximity to hospital (<60 km); intra-postoperative exclusion criteria: conversion to open surgery, early complications needing hospital monitoring or redo-operation, difficult pain management, <92 HbO2% saturation on room air or need for O2 supplementation, altered vital or laboratory parameters. Teleconsultations were scheduled as follows: the first one in afternoon of POD2, two on POD3, then once a day until chest tube removal. After discharge, patients recorded their vital signs at least four times a day using the device, which allowed two surgeons to monitor them via a mobile application. In the event of sudden changes in vital signs or the occurrence of adverse events, patients had access to a direct phone line and a dedicated re-hospitalization pathway. The primary outcome was safety, assessed by the occurrence of post-discharge complications or readmissions, as well as feasibility. Secondary outcomes: comparison of safety profile with a matched control group in which the standard of care and the evaluation of resource optimization were maintained and economic evaluation. Results: Between July 2022 and February 2024, 48 patients were enrolled in the present study. Six patients (12.5%) dropped out due to unsatisfied discharge criteria on POD2. Exclusion causes were: significant air leaks (n:2) requiring monitoring and the use of suction device, uncontrolled pain (n:2), atrial fibrillation, and occurrence of cerebral ischemia (n:1 each). The adherence rate to vital signs monitoring by patients was 100%. A mean number of four measurements per day was performed by each patient. During telehealth home monitoring, a total of 71/2163 (1.4%) vital sign measurements violated the established acceptable threshold in 22 (52%) patients. All critical violations were managed at home. During the surveillance period (defined as the time from POD 2 to the day of chest tube removal), a persistent air leak was recorded in one patient requiring readmission to the hospital (on POD 13) and re-intervention with placement of a second thoracic drainage due to unsatisfactory lung expansion. No other postoperative complication occurred nor was there any readmission needed. Compared to the control group, the discharge gain was 2.5 days, with an economic benefit of 528 €/day (55.440 € on the total enrolled population). Conclusions: Our results confirm that the adoption of telehealth home monitoring is feasible and allows a safe discharge on postoperative day two after robotic surgery for stage I-II NSCLC in selected patients. A potential economic benefit (141 days of hospitalizations avoided) for the healthcare system could result from the adoption of this protocol.
medicine, general & internal