Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to present an approach to intercultural training (IT) in which course participants are informed about various approaches to differences between peoples. Pitfalls in communication are identified that are due to overgeneralization of incidental observations of behavior and to psychological mechanisms such as stereotyping, ethnocentrism and attribution. Effects of poor command of a second language and paralinguistic factors are also included. Design/methodology/approach Intercultural communication training or IT programs often over-generalize incidental observations and make attributions about broad differences between "us" and "others". An approach to IT is described that challenges the way in which notions about "culture" and "cultures" tend to be used. Findings A training module based on the principles mentioned is described that was originally developed for military officers preparing for international peace-keeping and peace-building missions and later has been administered in various settings and countries. Research limitations/implications An exit questionnaire and postmission interviews have suggested positive effects of the training, but more systematic evaluation research is needed. Practical implications Cross-cultural communication (3C) training is mostly about how other people differ from "us". Better understanding may be gained with an approach that emphasizes how much humans everywhere are alike and that perceived differences can also be in the eye of the beholder. Social implications Mutual understanding is critical to positive interaction. The approach to 3C training taken here explains how much humans everywhere are alike and puts manifest differences into perspective. Originality/value The training module builds on available knowledge, notably from cross-cultural psychology. Except for a questionnaire to demonstrate ethnocentrism, there is hardly new information. However, the approach arranges available knowledge in a way that is rather novel for the field of 3C training.

Dialogue II: Advising Versus Preparing

Design Culture and Dialogic Design

Multicultural Dialogue: Dilemmas, Paradoxes, Conflicts

Introducing intercultural communication pedagogy and the question of the other

Intergenerational Family Dialogues: A Cultural Historical Tool Involving Family Members as Co-researchers Working with Visual Data

Becoming contemporaneous: intercultural communication pedagogy beyond culture and without ethics

A Way out of the Predicament of Social Sciences in the 20th Century: a Dialogue with Clifford Geertz’s Essay “thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”(part II)

Translingual transcultural competence: student agency, teacher guidance, and program support

2. Murky waters: Histories of intercultural communication research

The erotic transference.

From monologue to dialogue

Indigenous ways to go to school: Exploring many visions

Advice Across Cultures

Toward Critical Reflexivity through Critical Intercultural Communication Pedagogy: Student Discourse in an Intercultural Conflict Course

An approach to intercultural training deemphasizing cross-cultural differences

Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies

Dialogue and the Good: Fingers Pointing at the Moon?

What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration

Dialogic validation: a discourse analysis for conceptual development within dialogic classroom interaction

Defining Dialogues: Tracing the Evolution of Human-Machine Communication

Many faces of the concept of culture (and education)