Germline Mutational Profiles and Clinicopathological Features of Hereditary Breast Cancer in Chinese Population

Mengqian Ni,Fang Wang,Anli Yang,Qiong Shao,Cong Xue,Wen Xia,Fei Xu,Xi Lin,Jiajia Huang,Xiwen Bi,Ruoxi Hong,Meiting Chen,Qiufan Zheng,Kuikui Jiang,Xinhua Xie,Jun Tang,Xi Wang,Zhongyu Yuan,Shusen Wang,Yanxia Shi,Xin An
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4270632
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: Genetic testing plays an important role in guiding screening, diagnosis, and precision treatment of breast cancer (BC). However, the appropriate testing criteria for genetic testing remain controversial. The current study aims to facilitate the development of suitable strategies by analyzing the germline mutational profiles and clinicopathological features of large-scale Chinese BC patients.Methods: The clinical data of BC patients who had undergone genetic testing at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from September 2014 to March 2022 were collected. Their distribution and frequency of germline variants in BRCA1/2 testing and 21 genes panel testing were further analyzed.Results: A total of 1,035 BC patients were enrolled, and 237 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (P/LPV) were identified in 235 patients, including 41 out of 203 (19.6%) patients tested only for BRCA1/2 genes, and 194 out of 832 (23.3%) received 21 genes panel testing. Among the 235 P/LPV carriers, 222 (94.5%) met the NCCN high-risk criteria, and 13 (5.5%) did not. While using Desai’s criteria of testing all females diagnosed with BC by 60 years and NCCN criteria for older patients, 234 (99.6%) met the high-risk standard, and only one did not. The 21genes panel testing identified 4.9% of non-BRCA P/LPVs and a significantly high rate of VUSs (33.9%). The most common non-BRCA P/LPVs were PALB2 (11, 1.3%), TP53 (10, 1.2%), PTEN (3, 0.4%), CHEK2 (3, 0.4%), ATM (3, 0.4%), BRAD1(3, 0.4%), and RAD51C (2, 0.2%). Compared with BRCA1/2 P/LPVs, non-BRCA P/LPVs showed a significantly low incidence of NCCN criteria listed family history and second primary cancer, and different molecular subtypes.Conclusions: Desai’s criteria might be a more appropriate genetic testing strategy for Chinese BC patients. Panel testing could identify more non-BRCA P/LPVs than BRCA1/2 testing alone. Compared with BRCA1/2 P/LPVs, non-BRCA P/LPVs exhibited different personal and family histories of cancer and molecular subtype distributions. The optimal genetic testing strategy for BC still needs to be investigated with larger continuous population studies.Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2021YFE0206300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773279, 82073391 to Dr. Yanxia Shi), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2016A050502015, 2013B021800062 and 2012B061700082 to Dr. Yanxia Shi).Declaration of Interests: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.Ethics Approval Statement: All patients signed informed consent for genetic testing. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of SYSUCC and the Ministry of Science and Technology for human genetic resource collection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?