Abstract:The Grand Strategy of the United States, including its strategy toward China, has always been the product of the interaction of geopolitics and domestic politics. After the Cold War, with the end of the bipolar structure of the international system and the increasing polarization of domestic politics in the United States, the impact of geopolitics on the formulation of the foreign policy of the United States has been weakened to some degree, while the spillover effect of domestic politics has weighed more heavily than before. This change could be explained in the way that while two opposing trends of Partisan Realignment began to emerge in the post-financial crisis era in the United States, the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties had often focused on the preferences of their core political coalition as basis in foreign policy making, in order to further their own respective political interests. In regard to the American strategy toward China, with the deepening of the structural contradictions between China and the United States as well as changes in their respective external strategic choices, geopolitics became the primary logic in the formulation of American strategy toward China since 2009, thus the “strategic competition” has become the dominant mode of bilateral relations. In the view of Washington, China and the United States have formed a competitive relationship in the areas relating to the core interests of the United States, such as economy, security, values and the dominance of the existing international order. However, the questions of reality, such as how to compete with China and how to decide the priorities of their own core interests, are defined by demands of core political coalitions represented by the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties in the context of a new round of Partisan Realignment. From Obama to Trump, different domestic political logics made the focus of American strategy toward China shifted from “institution–values” competition based on globalism to “economy–security” competition based on nationalism. Therefore, the changes in American domestic politics will present an important channel through which the orientation of American strategy toward China would be clearly observed in the future.

U.S. Evolving Strategic Thinking about Taiwan

An Analysis of the Evolution and Basic Characteristics of U. S. Policy towards Taiwan

Unbalanced deterrence: coercive threat, reassurance and the US-China rivalry in Taiwan strait

Parallel Perceptions: Divergent Perspectives of the United States and China on the Taiwan Issue and Risky Implications

Does Taiwan Matter to the United States? Policy Debates on Taiwan Abandonment and Beyond

U.S Strategies In Maintaining Peace Across The Taiwan Strait

The Taiwan Dilemma in U.S. China Policy

From Strategic Ambiguity to Maximum Pressure? Explaining the Logic of the US Taiwan Policy in the Post–Cold War Era

The Emerging Ideological Security Dilemma Between China and the U.S.

The U.S. Factor in Peaceful Development of Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations

Taiwan: Can a Perfect Storm Be Averted?

US Taiwan Policy of Strategic Ambiguity: A Dilemma of Deterrence

Japan’s Taiwan Policy in the Xi Jinping Era: Moving Toward Strategic Clarity

Analysis of Several Fundamental Elements Affecting U.S. Policy-decision toward Taiwan

The Taiwan issue: A test of Sino‐U.S. relations

Exploring the Boundaries of China-US Strategic Competition

New Thinking about the Taiwan Issue : Theoretical insights into its origins, dynamics, and prospects

The Final Frontier: China, Taiwan, and the United States in Strategic Competition for Central America

Exacerbation of trade and economic relations between the United States and China at the present stage

Assessing the Radical Transformation of U.S. Policy Toward China

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020