Abstract:The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capture drought impacts on the terrestrial carbon uptake is poorly known. Here we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using observations of environmental variability and vegetation function and made comparisons with bottom‐up estimates of carbon uptake anomalies. We found that global inversions with only limited surface CO2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts. Regional inversions assimilating denser CO2 observations over Europe demonstrated some improved consistency, with all inversions capturing a reduction in carbon uptake during the 2012 drought. However, they failed to capture the reduction caused by the 2015 drought. Finally, we found that a set of inversions that assimilated satellite XCO2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO2 observations better captured carbon uptake anomalies induced by both the 2012 and 2015 droughts. In addition, the recent Orbiting Carbon Observatory—2 XCO2 inversions showed good potential in capturing drought impacts, with better performances for larger‐scale droughts like the 2018 drought. These results suggest that surface CO2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, and satellite XCO2 and ancillary environmental data can be used to improve observational constraints in atmospheric inversion systems. Atmospheric CO2 inverse models (AIMs) are useful tools for quantifying the response of large‐scale carbon uptake to climate extremes, but their capacity for monitoring drought impacts, particularly at regional scales, is not fully explored. In this study, we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs for monitoring drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using a large array of observational and model data sets. We found: (a) global inversions with only limited surface CO2 observations face a great challenge in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake; (b) Regional inversions assimilated denser CO2 observations over Europe, for the EUROCOM project, demonstrated some improved consistency but are still deficient, showing divergent estimates in interannual variability of carbon uptake for most years; and (c) A set of inversion systems that assimilated satellite XCO2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO2 observations better captured annual and seasonal anomalies caused by droughts. Our study demonstrates that surface CO2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, whereby satellite XCO2 and ancillary environmental data can offer observational constraints for improving the estimates. Global inversions with only limited surface CO2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts on the European carbon uptake Regional inversions assimilating denser CO2 observations over Europe demonstrate some improved consistency but are still deficient The inversions assimilating satellite XCO2 or environmental variables in addition to surface CO2 largely improve the estimates Global inversions with only limited surface CO2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts on the European carbon uptake Regional inversions assimilating denser CO2 observations over Europe demonstrate some improved consistency but are still deficient The inversions assimilating satellite XCO2 or environmental variables in addition to surface CO2 largely improve the estimates

Responses of European Forest Fluxes to the 2022 Heatwave and Drought Recorded by ICOS Eddy-covariance Stations

Author Correction: Temperature Extremes of 2022 Reduced Carbon Uptake by Forests in Europe

Altered energy partitioning across terrestrial ecosystems in the European drought year 2018

The Fingerprint of the Summer 2018 Drought in Europe on Ground-Based Atmospheric CO2measurements

Quantifying impacts of the drought 2018 on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003

Impacts Of Extreme Summers On European Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis Of 2003, 2010 And 2018

Sensitivity of gross primary productivity to climatic drivers during the summer drought of 2018 in Europe

Increased Vulnerability of European Ecosystems to Two Consecutive Extreme Summers

Vulnerability of European Ecosystems to Two Compound Dry and Hot Summers in 2018 and 2019

Water-use Efficiency and Transpiration Across European Forests During the Anthropocene

Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity

Contrasting Response of European Forest and Grassland Energy Exchange to Heatwaves

Evidence for Soil Water Control on Carbon and Water Dynamics in European Forests During the Extremely Dry Year: 2003

The Divergent Resistance and Resilience of Forest and Grassland Ecosystems to Extreme Summer Drought in Carbon Sequestration

The impact of drought spells on forests depends on site conditions: The case of 2017 summer heat wave in southern Europe

Non-stomatal processes reduce gross primary productivity in temperate forest ecosystems during severe edaphic drought

Above-treeline ecosystems facing drought: lessons from the 2022 European summer heat wave

Detecting the Critical Periods That Underpin Interannual Fluctuations in the Carbon Balance of European Forests

Detection and attribution of an anomaly in terrestrial photosynthesis in Europe during the COVID-19 lockdown

The Contrasting Role of Forests and Grassland on Land-Climate Interaction During Recent European Heat Waves

Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?