Abstract:Objective:To compare and analyze the calcification characteristics and diagnostic efficiency of different breast lesion types using digtal breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).Methods:Totally 1 263 patients who underwent both DBT and FFDM at the same time from January 2015 to December 2018 in Dahua Hospital, Xuhui district, Shanghai were analyzed retrospectively. Benign and malignant calcification should be confirmed by pathology or a follow-up of 24 months or more using mammography, and the results of DBT and FFDM were taken as a gold standard. The detection rate and diagnostic efficiency of different types of benign and malignant breast calcification with the two methods were compared and analyzed. The detection rate of morphology and distribution of malignant calcification were compared among groups.Results:There were 240 cases with non-dense breast including 56 cases with benign calcification and 13 cases with malignant calcification. Meanwhile, there were 1 023 cases with dense breast, including 356 cases with benign calcification and 63 cases with malignant calcification. In the cases of non-dense breast, the detection rates of benign calcification by DBT and FFDM were 22.9% (55/240) and 21.7% (52/240), whereas the rates of malignant calcification were 5.0% (12/240) and 4.6% (11/240), all without statistically significances（χ2=0.108, 0.046, P>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the morphology and distribution of malignant calcification detection rates ( P>0.05). In the cases of dense breast, the benign calcification detection rates by DBT and FFDM were 34.2% (350/1 023) and 31.9% (326/1 023), whereas the detection rates of malignant calcification were 6.0% (61/1 023) and 4.9% (50/1 023), all without statistically significances (χ2=1.273 and 1.153, P>0.05). DBT detected more cases of amorphous and cluster distribution of malignant calcification than FFDM, with statistically significant differences (χ2=12.921 and 11.667, P<0.05). The area under ROC curve of DBT and FFDM in diagnosis of non-dense breast were 0.993 and 0.992, and 0.987 and 0.964 in dense breast, respectively, with no significant differences ( Z= 0.136 and 1.391, P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with FFDM, DBT shows no statistical difference in the diagnostic efficiency of breast calcification. However, it has certain advantages in detecting malignant, amorphous, and clustered calcification in dense breast. DBT has a potential to improve the accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast calcification.

Application of digital breast tomosynthesis for the analysis of non-calcified BI-RADS 4A lesions on mammograms

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images in Breast Disease

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Diagnosis of Dense Breast Lesions

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Synthesized Two-Dimensional Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone or in Combination with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

AI-based strategies in breast mass ≤ 2 cm classification with mammography and tomosynthesis

Comparative Study of Imaging Methods for Architectural Distortion of the Breast

A New Application of Multimodality Radiomics Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Patients with Microcalcifications-Only in Mammography

Breast Cancers Detected during a Decade of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Comparison with Digital Mammography

Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions

Diagnosis of architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis using radiomics and deep learning

Digital breast tomosynthesis(DBT) vs 2D mammography and impact of combined use: A meta-analysis

Role of BI-RADS in Guiding Surgical Inter Vention of Non-Palpable, Ultrasound-Negative and Mammography-Suspicious Breast Lesions

Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach

Efficiency of the detection and diagnosis of calcification in breast lesions by digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography

Comparative analysis of cone‐beam breast computed tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis: A comprehensive study on reconstruction algorithms

Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging

Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer

An effective fine grading method of BI-RADS classification in mammography

Sonographic features of dense breast imaging reporting and data system 4 ( BI-RADS-US 4 ) for non-palpable breast lesions