Open questions on toxic heavy metals Cd, Hg and Pb binding small components of DNA and nucleobases. Are there any predictable trends?
Alvaro Pérez-Barcia,M. Merced Montero-Campillo,Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi,Jean-Yves Salpin,Manuel Yanez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cp02459d
IF: 3.3
2022-08-26
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Abstract:In this perspective article, after a bibliographic compilation of experimental and theoretical work on Cd, Hg, and Pb, we analyze in detail the bonding of M2+ and CH3M+ (M= Zn, Cd, Hg, Pb) with urea and thiourea, as suitable models for larger biochemical bases. Through the use of DFT calculations, we have found that although in principle binding energies decrease according to ionic size (Zn2+ > Cd2+ > Pb2+), Hg2+ largely breaks the trend. Through the use of EDA it is possible to explain this behavior which is essentially due to the strong contribution of polarization to the binding. This conclusion is ratified when the NEDA formalism is used showing that the charge transfer term is very large in all cases, but particularly in the case of the mercury-thiourea system. The general trends observed for the interaction with CH3M+(M = Zn, Cd, Hg, Pb) monocations show however CH3Hg+ binding energies systematically smaller than CH3Zn+ ones, likely because the relativistic contraction of the Hg orbitals is very much attenuated by the attachment to the methyl group. Finally, we have investigated the gas-phase reaction between EtHg+ and uracil to be compared with that exhibited by CH3Hg+ and n-ButHg+ previously described in the literature, so that we have gathered new information to highlight the importance of the length of the alkyl chain attached to the metal on the mechanisms of these reactions. For methyl mercury, only the alkyl transfer process is allowed, for butyl mercury, protonation is clearly favored and for ethyl mercury, both paths are competitive experimentally.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical