Abstract:Background: Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reverse (FFR) is the standard of the functional assessment of lesion severity. In spite of its strengths in determining ischemia-related coronary stenosis, the invasive operation involved still limits its clinical application. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived FFR (CCTA-FFR) or computed tomography-derived FFR (CT-FFR) has been indicated as an effective and non-invasive index to evaluate lesion-specific ischemia. However, its diagnostic performance, especially in patients with different severity of coronary stenosis, remains unknown. The current research attempted to demonstrate this problem and provided the foundation for extensive clinical application of CCTA-FFR.Methods: The design of this study was a diagnostic test. A total of 97 vessels from 91 patients who performed CCTA and coronary angiography (CAG) during a hospitalization collected from two research centers were included in this study. CCTA-FFR and FFR were obtained by CCTA and CAG separately. The Gensini score was calculated according to the CAG in each patient. FFR was indicated as the golden diagnosis of lesion-specific ischemia with a cut-off value of 0.80, which was consistent with most contemporary studies. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, simple linear analysis, and Bland-Altman plot were performed to determine the diagnostic performance of CCTA-FFR.Results: CCTA-FFR was well correlated with invasive FFR (R2=0.745, P<0.001) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.976. The sensitivity was 94.6% and the specificity was 95.1%. The mean difference between FFR and CT-FFR was 0.011, and the 95% confidence interval was -0.173 to 0.196. The AUCs were 0.989 and 0.928 in the low and high Gensini groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracies between these two groups (Z=0.003, P>0.500). CT-FFR still exhibited a good correlation with FFR (R2=0.713, P<0.001 in the low Gensini group and R2=0.743, P<0.001 in the high Gensini group). The systematic differences were calculated, and the mean difference between FFR and CT-FFR was -0.005 and 0.025, respectively, in these two groups.Conclusions: CCTA-FFR exhibited good diagnostic performance in patients with different Gensini score levels. Our results indicate that CCTA-FFR could be an effective tool to screen lesion-specific ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Detecting Lesion-Specific Ischemia in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease with Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve Measured at Different Sites

Effect of lesion characteristics on diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve: exploring the indications for application based on CT-FFR CHINA trial (Preprint)

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

The value of combined analysis of plaque characteristics and stenosis based on coronary CT angiography in improving CT diagnostic performance for lesion-specific myocardial ischemia

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Detection of Lesion-Specific Ischemia

Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Stable Angina: Can CT Compete with Angiography?

Optimal Measurement Sites of Coronary-Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve the Insight from China CT-FFR Study

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography in ischemia-specific coronary artery stenosis and indeterminate lesions: results from a multicenter study in China

Change in Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Across the Lesion Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Functional Coronary Stenosis

Effect of Measurement Sites on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in the Diagnosis of Coronary Stenosis Ischemia

Diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: A multi-center study and meta-analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-FFR with a New Coarse-to-fine Subpixel Algorithm in Detecting Lesion-Specific Ischemia: a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Optimal Measurement Sites of Coronary-Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Verification of Coronary Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement Site for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reverse in lesion-specific ischemia patients with different Gensini score levels

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Diastolic versus systolic coronary computed tomography angiography derived fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia

Diagnostic performance of the quantitative flow ratio and CT-FFR for coronary lesion-specific ischemia

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis.