Management and staging of anal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis

Alexander Troester,Julia Kohn,Qi Wang,Lauren Weaver,Imran Hassan,Wolfgang Gaertner,Schelomo Marmor,Paolo Goffredo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.013
2024-01-01
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Abstract:Background Anal adenocarcinoma is rare with no standardized treatment regimen or staging system. As a result, different combinations of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are used in management. Within the staging system, tumor stage can be based on depth of invasion, as for rectal adenocarcinoma, or size, as in anal squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to analyze patterns of care and clinically available staging systems for anal adenocarcinoma using a national database. Methods Adults diagnosed with anal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019). Six different treatment regimens were identified. Stages were categorized according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classifications of rectal adenocarcinoma and anal squamous cell carcinoma. Results Of 1,040 patients, 48% were female, median age was 67 years, and 18% had distant metastases. Chemoradiotherapy + abdominoperineal resection was the most common treatment regimen (22%). Five-year overall and disease-specific survival were highest for local excision only (67% and 85%) and lowest in the alternative group (34% and 48%). After adjustment, treatment groups that did not include surgery were associated with worse 5-year overall survival. In multivariable analysis, T stage based on depth of invasion showed incrementally lower overall survival for T2 and T3 anal adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Omission of surgical resection in combination with chemoradiotherapy was associated with worse overall and disease-specific survival, suggesting the relevance of surgery in anal adenocarcinoma management. Prognostically, rectal staging based on depth of invasion better discriminated between T stages, indicating that providers should consider utilizing this system in practice.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?