Abstract:Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article presents decentralized FL solutions based on blockchain. For each direction, we discuss specific technical solutions, their advantages, and disadvantages. By evaluating various defense methods, we identify the most suitable approach to address the primary challenge of "achieving a secure and robust FL system against malicious adversaries while protecting users' privacy." We then propose a theoretical reference framework for end‐to‐end protection of privacy and security in FL for the key problem, which summarizes the attack surface of FL systems from the client to the server under the security model where the client and server are malicious. Leveraging the strengths and characteristics of existing schemes, our proposed framework integrates multiple techniques to strike a balance between privacy, usability, and efficiency. This framework serves as a valuable reference and provides insights for future work in the field. Finally, we also provide recommendations for future research directions in this field.

FedSecurity: A Benchmark for Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning and Federated LLMs

FedSecurity: Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning and Federated LLMs

Fedward: Flexible Federated Backdoor Defense Framework with Non-IID Data

FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learning

HQsFL: A Novel Training Strategy for Constructing High-performance and Quantum-safe Federated Learning

FEDLAD: Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses

FedPD: Defending federated prototype learning against backdoor attacks

Emerging Safety Attack and Defense in Federated Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models

SMSS: Secure Member Selection Strategy in Federated Learning

DarkFed: A Data-Free Backdoor Attack in Federated Learning

Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

Federated Learning Attack Surface: Taxonomy, Cyber Defences, Challenges, and Future Directions

FedMultimodal: A Benchmark for Multimodal Federated Learning

Federated Learning Attacks and Defenses: A Survey

FedNor: A Robust Training Framework for Federated Learning Based on Normal Aggregation

Security and Privacy Threats to Federated Learning: Issues, Methods, and Challenges

FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning

Advancements in Federated Learning: Models, Methods, and Privacy

FedCL: Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning with Confidence Levels

Delving into the Adversarial Robustness of Federated Learning