Abstract:Fairness plays a crucial role in children's social life and has garnered considerable attention. However, previous research and theories primarily examined the development of children's fairness behaviors in the conflict between self-interest motivation and fairness-complying motivation, neglecting the influence of advantage-seeking motivation. Moreover, despite the well-established role of gain/loss frame in human decision-making, it remains largely unclear whether the framing effect modulates fairness behaviors in children. It was hypothesized that children would exhibit advantage-seeking motivation resulting in more selfish behaviors in the loss context. To examine the hypothesis, we combined an adapted dictator game and computational modeling to investigate various motivations underlying fairness behaviors of children in both loss and gain contexts and to explore the developmental directions by contrasting children and adults. In addition, the current design enabled the dissociation between fairness knowledge and behaviors by asking participants to decide for themselves (the first-party role) or for others (the third-party role). This study recruited a total of 34 children (9–10 years, M age = 9.82, SD age = 0.38, 16 females) and 31 college students ( M age = 19.81, SD age = 1.40, 17 females). The behavioral results indicated that children behaved more selfishly in first-party and more fairly in third-party than adults, without any significant framing effects. The computational results revealed that both children and adults exhibited aversion to advantageous and disadvantageous inequity in third-party. However, they showed distinct preferences for advantageous inequity in first-party, with advantage-seeking preferences among children and aversion to advantageous inequity among adults. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of children's social preferences and their developmental directions.

The Effect of Proposer's Class Role on the Fairness Preference of Middle and Upper Grade Students in Primary School:An ERP Study

Neural Correlates of Proposers’ Fairness Perception in Punishment and Non-Punishment Economic Games

The Impact of Information Presented Order on Fairness Judgment Forming

Rank Preserving Preferences

Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials

Group Membership Modulates Fairness Consideration Among Deaf College Students—An Event-Related Potential Study

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

Developmental patterns and computational mechanisms of school-aged children's fairness-related decision making under social comparison

Influence of HIV Infection on Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Treated for Tuberculosis in the Context of Wide Access to HAART, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making

Social information affects adults' evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach

The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

You Are Excusable! Neural Correlates of Economic Neediness on Empathic Concern and Fairness Perception.

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Social hierarchies in third-party punishment: A behavioral and ERP study