The Midwinter Suppression of the North Pacific Storm Track Associated with the East Asian Trough and Pacific Blocking

Minghao Yang,Chongyin Li,Xin Li,Xiong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06808-5
IF: 4.901
2023-01-01
Climate Dynamics
Abstract:The North Pacific storm track (NPST) does not peak around midwinter when atmospheric baroclinicity is the strongest, which is known as midwinter suppression. The association of the year-to-year variation in the midwinter suppression of the low-level NPST with the East Asian trough (EAT) and North Pacific atmospheric blocking (PB) is investigated by using NCEP/NCAR reanalysis during 1948–2018. The results show that the year-to-year variation in the midwinter suppression of the NPST is significantly related to those of the EAT and PB. The midwinter suppression is striking when the midwinter EAT or PB strengthens. However, when the midwinter EAT weakens, the midwinter suppression of the NPST becomes inapparent or even disappears. While the seasonal cycle of the eastern NPST exhibits a single peak in January with a nonexistent midwinter suppression during the years with inhibited PB, the western NPST has a prominent midwinter suppression with the maximum amplitude occurring in March. The seasonal march of the Siberian storm track is not in agreement with that of the NPST when the midwinter EAT is weak, which suggests that upstream seeding may not be a dominant mechanism to understand midwinter suppression. The EAT and PB can not only individually but also jointly associate the midwinter suppression of the NPST. In addition, there is a significant in-phase relationship between the EAT and PB intensities. The EAT may affect the PB by modifying the meridional gradient of background potential vorticity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?