Gender and family-role portrayals of autism in British newspapers: An intersectional corpus-based study
Themis Karaminis,Costas Gabrielatos,Ursula Maden-Weinberger,Geoffrey Beattie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241303547
2024-12-13
Autism
Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. A recent large-scale study on the portrayal of autism in British newspapers revealed a deficit-based coverage, which concentrated on children and boys in particular, typically represented from the mothers' perspective. This follow-up study refines these representations, considering how they differ by gender and family role. We analysed 2998 text samples, which discussed autism in the context of four combinations of gender and family roles, namely, BOY, GIRL, FATHER and MOTHER. These samples included sources with different publication dates, reporting style and political orientation. Autism representations remained negative regardless of gender and family role. Over time, stories about autistic girls started to emerge, identifying them as a distinct group explicitly compared to autistic boys. Newspapers, especially broadsheets, associated girls with diagnostic difficulties, camouflaging and sometimes gender dysphoria − discussed particularly for those assigned female at birth. The child's autism was more often attributed to maternal than paternal behaviours or lifestyle. Autistic mothers were mentioned more often than fathers and were portrayed negatively. We conclude that newspapers portray female autism as less significant than male autism and, in addition, place mothers under more ethical scrutiny than fathers. These disparities reflect both historical biases in autism research and gender and family-role stereotypes.Lay abstractNews media influence how society views different social groups. A recent study which examined how British newspapers represent autism found that the coverage was largely negative, focused mainly on boys, and often presented their stories from the perspectives of their mothers. This follow-up study aims to understand how these representations vary by gender and family role. We analysed 2998 short newspaper texts discussing autism in terms of four groups: boys, girls, fathers and mothers. We looked at articles from different times, with various reporting styles and political leanings. Across all these sources, autism was portrayed negatively regardless of gender or family role. Over time, newspapers did tend to mention autistic girls more frequently, highlighting them as a distinct group compared to autistic boys. Newspapers, especially broadsheets, often focused on how autistic girls face difficulties in getting diagnosed and hide their characteristics, and on the role autism may play in gender identity issues, particularly for girls assigned female at birth. In addition, newspapers attributed more blame for the child's autism to mothers' than fathers' behaviours. Autistic mothers were mentioned more frequently than fathers, however these mentions were often negative. Our results suggest that newspapers portray autism in girls as less significant than the autism of boys and criticise mothers of autistic children more harshly than their fathers. These findings reflect long-standing biases in autism research and reinforce broader stereotypes about gender and family roles. Such biased reporting may hinder public understanding and acceptance of the diverse experiences within the autistic community.
psychology, developmental