Single-center phase 2 study of PD-1 inhibitor combined with DNA hypomethylation agent + CAG regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Xiao-Ning Gao,Yong-Feng Su,Meng-yue Li,Yu Jing,Jun Wang,Lei Xu,Lin-Lin Zhang,An Wang,Yi-Zhi Wang,Xuan Zheng,Yan-Fen Li,Dai-Hong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03454-y
IF: 6.63
2023-01-01
Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy
Abstract:Anti-PD-1 monotherapy had limited clinical efficacy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML patients with higher PD-1 and PD-L1 expression. Hence, we investigated the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor with DNA hypomethylating agent (HMA) + CAG regimen in patients who had failed prior AML therapy. In this phase 2, single-arm study, r/r AML patients received azacitidine or decitabine plus CAG regimen with tislelizumab. Primary endpoints were efficacy (objective response rate [ORR]) and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and duration of response (DOR). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 and SPSS 20.0 software where P < 0.05 denoted significance. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled patients and completed 1 cycle, and 14 (51.9%) and 4 (14.8%) patients completed 2 and 3 cycles, respectively. ORR was 63% (14: complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi], 3: partial remission (PR), 10: no response [NR]). Median OS (mOS) and EFS were 9.7 and 9.2 months, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.2 months (1.1–26.9), the mOS was not reached in responders (CR/CRi/PR) while it was 2.4 months (0.0–5.4) in nonresponders ( P = 0.002). Grade 2–3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 4 (14.8%) patients and 3 nonresponders died of lung infection after treatment. Tislelizumab + HMA + CAG regimen showed improved outcomes in r/r AML patients with lower pretherapy leukemia burden. irAEs were mild and low-grade and higher pretherapy bone marrow CD4 + CD127 + PD-1 + T cells might serve as a predictor of treatment response. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04541277.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?