Abstract:Purpose: We acknowledge that between endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, with some evidence of benefits observed in clinical trials. However, there remains a significant gap in the evidence regarding the real-world application and effectiveness of EVT.The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy differences between EVT and standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion(BAO). Methods: Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with BAO who underwent EVT and SMT were identified through searches in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy outcomes included good clinical outcomes [defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 90 days], excellence clinical outcomes (defined as mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days), 90-day mortality rate, and reperfusion status. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study type (prospective and retrospective studies). The relationship between EVT and SMT with the prognosis of BAO patients was expressed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: The seven studies involved a total of 2885 patients. After conducting sensitivity analysis and excluding articles with high heterogeneity, EVT demonstrated a significant association with good clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=4.01, 95% CI: 2.60-6.19) and excellence clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=5.70, 95% CI: 3.18-10.22) compared to SMT. Additionally, EVT showed a lower correlation with 90-day mortality rate compared to the SMT group (OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.47). Subgroup analysis based on study type revealed that EVT had higher rates of successful reperfusion (retrospective study group: OR=7.97, 95% CI: 4.83-13.15; prospective study group: OR=51.57, 95% CI: 29.76-89.38) than the SMT group in both subgroups. The presence of sICH was not statistically significant in the retrospective study group (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.58-2.48) and showed high heterogeneity. However, in the prospective study group, EVT exhibited a higher risk of bleeding compared to SMT (OR=11.42, 95% CI: 2.65-49.20). Conclusions: In summary, our real-world study aligns with the conclusions of recently published randomized controlled trials research. When comparing EVT and SMT in the treatment of BAO, EVT shows a higher correlation with favorable clinical outcomes, higher rates of successful reperfusion, and lower mortality rates. However, it does come with an increased risk of sICH.

Rescue Stenting after Failure of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion: Data from the PERSIST Registry.

Correction To: Predictors of Poor Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Vertebrobasilar Occlusion: Data from ANGEL‑ACT Registry

The Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Caused by Large-Vessel Occlusion with Different Etiologies of Stroke: Data from ANGEL-ACT Registry

Incidence and Predictors of Futile Recanalisation after Endovascular Therapy in Acute Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion Patients: Insight from the ANGEL-ACT Registry

Endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion due to different stroke etiologies of large artery atherosclerosis and cardioembolism.

Intracranial Stenting as Rescue Therapy After Failure of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion: Data From the ANGEL-ACT Registry

Rescue intracranial stenting for failed posterior circulation thrombectomy: analysis from the Stenting and Angioplasty in NeuroThrombectomy (SAINT) study

Rescue stenting after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy to treat acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion

Effect of Baseline Characteristics on the Outcome of Stent Retriever–Based Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: A Single-Center Experience and Pooled Data Analysis

Abstract 158: Rescue Strategy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis of the SVIN Registry

The Safety and Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment for Patients with Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusions: According to the BEST and BASICS Criteria

Efficacy and safety of rescue stenting following failed mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: propensity score analysis.

Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion?

Rescue Intracranial Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke after the Failure of Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Progressive Stroke in Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.

Effect of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia on endovascular therapy in acute posterior circulation infarction

Abstract 149: Successful Reperfusion after Endovascular Treatment Predicted Favorable Outcome in the Basilar Artery Occlusion Endovascular Intervention Versus Standard Medical Treatment (BEST) Trial

Remedial angioplasty or stenting for acute basilar artery occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ATTENTION Trial

Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Preliminary study of endovascular therapy of acute completely vertebrobasilar artery occlusion in acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke

Real-world safety and efficacy endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis