Synergistic Effect of Cu Single Atoms and Au–Cu Alloy Nanoparticles on TiO 2 for Efficient CO 2 Photoreduction
Yangyang Yu,Xing’an Dong,Peng Chen,Qin Geng,Hong Wang,Jieyuan Li,Ying Zhou,Fan Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c03961
IF: 17.1
2021-09-01
ACS Nano
Abstract:The synergy between metal alloy nanoparticles (NPs) and single atoms (SAs) should maximize the catalytic activity. However, there are no relevant reports on photocatalytic CO2 reduction via utilizing the synergy between SAs and alloy NPs. Herein, we developed a facile photodeposition method to coload the Cu SAs and Au–Cu alloy NPs on TiO2 for the photocatalytic synthesis of solar fuels with CO2 and H2O. The optimized photocatalyst achieved record-high performance with formation rates of 3578.9 for CH4 and 369.8 μmol g–1 h–1 for C2H4, making it significantly more realistic to implement sunlight-driven synthesis of value-added solar fuels. The combined in situ FT-IR spectra and DFT calculations revealed the molecular mechanisms of photocatalytic CO2 reduction and C–C coupling to form C2H4. We proposed that the synergistic function of Cu SAs and Au–Cu alloy NPs could enhance the adsorption activation of CO2 and H2O and lower the overall activation energy barrier (including the rate-determining step) for the CH4 and C2H4 formation. These factors all enable highly efficient and stable production of solar fuels of CH4 and C2H4. The concept of synergistic SAs and metal alloys cocatalysts can be extended to other systems, thus contributing to the development of more effective cocatalysts.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c03961.Figure S1, HAADF images of Au/TiO2, Cu0.2Au0.8/TiO2, Cu0.4Au0.6/TiO2, Cu0.6Au0.4/TiO2, Cu0.8Au0.2/TiO2, and Cu/TiO2; Figure S2, TEM images and HAADF-STEM images of Cu0.8Au0.2/TiO2; Figure S3, XRD pattern of the photocatalysts; Figure S4, DFT calculation results: the calculated electrostatic potentials for Cu (a) Au (b) Cu–Au alloy (c) Cu/TiO2, Au/TiO2 and Cu–Au alloy/TiO;. Figure S5, ESR spectra for photogenerated electrons under simulated sunlight for 10 min; Figure S6, DMPO ESR spectra in the dark and under simulated sunlight for 10 min for •O2– (a) and •OH (b); Figure S7, DFT calculation of COCO adsorption on the surface of Cu SAs/TiO2; Table S1, comparison of previous works about photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CH4/CO; Table S2, comparison of previous works about photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to C2H4; Table S3, CH4, C2H4, H2, and CO formation rates and selectivity of Cu0.8Au0.2/TiO2 after 8 h simulated sunlight (AM1.5G) irradiation; Table S4, CH4, C2H4, H2, and CO formation rates of Cu0.8Au0.2/TiO2 after 8 h simulated sunlight irradiation; Table S5, optimized structures of CO2 and H2O molecules absorbed on photocatalysts, and their adsorption energies and Gibbs free energies. The charge difference distribution between CO2 and photocatalysts (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology