Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective

Celine Blank,Rogier Rudolf Wildeboer,Ilse DeCroo,Kelly Tilleman,Basiel Weyers,Petra de Sutter,Massimo Mischi,Benedictus Christiaan Schoot
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.030
IF: 6.7
2019-02-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To develop a random forest model (RFM) to predict implantation potential of a transferred embryo and compare it with a multivariate logistic regression model (MvLRM), based on data from a large cohort including in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients treated with the use of single-embryo transfer (SET) of blastocyst-stage embryos.DESIGN: Retrospective study of a 2-year single-center cohort of women undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI).SETTING: Academic hospital.PATIENT(S): Data from 1,052 women who underwent fresh SET in IVF or ICSI cycles were included.INTERVENTION(S): None.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The performance of both RFM and MvLRM to predict pregnancy was quantified in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), classification accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity.RESULT(S): ROC analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.74 ± 0.03 for the proposed RFM and 0.66 ± 0.05 for the MvLRM for the prediction of ongoing pregnancies of ≥11 weeks. This RFM approach and the MvLRM yielded, respectively, sensitivities of 0.84 ± 0.07 and 0.66 ± 0.08 and specificities of 0.48 ± 0.07 and 0.58 ± 0.08.CONCLUSION(S): The performance to predict ongoing implantation will significantly improve with the use of an RFM approach compared with MvLRM.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?