Research on the differences in blue and green space quality of resi-dents in different types of urban community based on activity space

CHENG Jia-qi,HU Hong,SHU Tian-yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.01.006

2023-01-01

Human Geography

Abstract:Human-oriented research on dynamic blue-green spatial quality differences has received increasing attention from academic community in recent years. First, most studies focus on analyzing the fairness of residents with different incomes in accessing blue-green space, but rarely cross-discuss the blue-green space quality of residents of different community types and income levels. Second, the existing related research mostly evaluate blue-green space quality based on the buffer area of communities（residential locations）which are static and limited, but seldom compares the quality of blue-green space around the activity paths of residents. Third, the quality of blue space and green space have different effects on residents’ physical and mental health, and it is necessary to measure them respectively. From the perspective of urban residential differentiation, the article takes the blue-green space quality of different income groups living in unit communities, traditional communities, urban villages, social housing and commercial housing communities in the central city of Nanjing as the research objects. The study first examines the qualities of blue-green space around the activity locations and travel paths of the research objects, and then studies the influence mechanism of blue-green space qualities on the residents’ environmental perception. The study shows that, based on the measurement of activity space, the spatial contact quality, landscape ecological quality and health service quality of blue-green space show significant differences, and the advantages of blue-green space for different types of community residents shows different aspects in three quality dimensions.