Development of perceived stigma questionnaire for caregivers of of people living with HIV/AIDS and its test of the reliability and validity

ZHANG Yukun,CUI Yuanbin,HU Yan,ZHU Zheng,WANG Anni,ZOU Luoluo,ZHANG Lin,WANG Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2023.25.015
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective To develop a perceived stigma questionnaire for caregivers of people living with HIV/AIDS(PLWH) and to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Methods The item pool team was developed based on the literature review and combined with the HIV/AIDS perceived stigma questionnaire developed earlier by the team, and the original questionnaire was formed through Delphi consultation and a pilot test. A total of 251 caregivers of PLWH in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and the Fourth People’s Hospital of Nanning in Guangxi from July to December 2020 were recruited for the survey, and item was screened through project analysis after data were collated. SPSS(version 26.0) software was used for reliability test and exploratory factor analysis(EFA) while Amos(version 24.0) software was used for confirmatory factor analysis(CFA),and these were comprehensively tested the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Results The formed questionnaire of perceived discrimination of caregivers of PLWH consists of 2 dimensions(health-related stigma and social and behavioral stigma) and 11 items in total. Item-level and scale-level content validity indexes(I-CVI and S-CVI) were 1.00; In the EFA, two common factors were extracted from both the frequency sub-scale and impact sub-scale with cumulative variance contribution rates of 64.284% and 64.904%, respectively, and factor loading coefficients for all items were above 0.4. In the CFA, the average variance extracts(AVE) of the frequency sub-scale were 0.607 and 0.516, and the composite reliability(CR) were 0.815 and 0.893; In the impact sub-scale, the AVE were 0.545 and 0.559,and CR were 0.767 and 0.909. Cronbach’s α coefficient of frequency and impact sub-scales were 0.899 and 0.848, the test-retest coefficient were 0.991 and 0.896, respectively(P<0.001). Conclusion The perceived stigma questionnaire for caregivers of PLWH possesses relatively satisfying reliability and validity, and is a competent tool for caregivers’ stigma measurement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?