Abstract:BackgroundMany interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts.MethodsWe used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts.ResultsThe CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct.ConclusionThe CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.

Development and introduction of complex intervention development and evaluation framework

Development and evaluation of complex intervention]

Analysis on the research status of interprofessional collaboration compentence and its enlightenment to nursing

[Development, appraisal and synthesis of complex interventions - a methodological challenge]

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation

Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework

Development of the Implementability Assessment Tool for Clinical Practice Guidelines Based on the COSMIN Framework and Factorial Experiment: a Study Protocol

Unpacking the Cinderella black box of complex intervention development through the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) programme of research

Building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework.

Adaptability, Scalability and Sustainability (ASaS) of complex health interventions: a systematic review of theories, models and frameworks

Critical Appraisal of Chinese Intervention Nursing Studies

[Introduction to PRISMA-CI Extension Statement and Checklist Systematic Reviews on Complex Interventions].

Developing and Evaluating Digital Public Health Interventions Using the Digital Public Health Framework DigiPHrame: A Framework Development Study

Summary and Thinking on Application of Best Practice Guideline in Nursing Teaching

The framework of evidence-based continued quality improvement

Enhancing competency of clinical research nurses: A comprehensive training and evaluation framework

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

The CONSIDER Intervention Fidelity Framework for Complex Interventions in Healthcare: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis

Effectiveness of using implementation frameworks to facilitate the implementation of a stroke management guideline in the Traditional Chinese Medicine hospitals in China: protocol for a factorial randomized controlled trial