Comparative study of acute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion with and without basilar artery embolism

张洋,王丽娜,朱良付,马振凯,周腾飞,周志龙,管民,吴立恒,李天晓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20220517-00258
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics and treatment effects of patients with acute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion complicated with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD-AIVAO) with and without basilar artery embolism.Methods:We prospectively included ICAD-AIVAO patients who underwent emergency endovascular treatment within 24 hours from the onset at the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Henan Provincial People′s Hospital from February 2017 to June 2021 and collected their clinical, imaging, treatment, as well as follow-up data. All patients with AIVAO were caused by in situ atherosclerotic thrombosis (ISAT). The patients were divided into the ISAT group and the ISAT with basilar artery embolism group according to whether there was artery-to-artery embolism involving the basilar artery. The baseline data, treatment and outcomes of the two groups were compared.Results:A total of 52 patients were enrolled. Males accounted for 90.4% (47/52), and progressive onset accounted for 57.7% (30/52). Compared with the ISAT group (32 cases), the ISAT with basilar artery embolism group (20 cases) had lower preoperative DWI-based posterior circulation Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score (DWI-pc-ASPECTS) and basilar artery on computed tomography angiography (BATMAN) score, higher pons midbrain index (PMI), and higher incidence of brainstem infarction and midbrain infarction (all P<0.05). The number of mechanical thrombectomy in the ISAT with basilar artery embolism group was higher than that in the ISAT group [ M ( Q1, Q3): 2 (1, 2) vs. 1 (0, 2), P=0.030]. The complete reperfusion rate in the ISAT with basilar artery embolism group was higher than that in the ISAT group [75.0% (15/20) vs. 46.9% (15/32), P=0.046]. However, there was no significant difference in the successful reperfusion rate, 90-day functional independence rate, 90-day good outcome rate, and 90-day mortality between the two groups (all P>0.05). During perioperative period, there was no significant difference in the dissection, embolic escape, and sICH (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) within 7 days after operation between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Compared with those without basilar artery embolism, the patients of ICAD-AIVAO with basilar artery embolism have a higher rate of brainstem infarction, more times of mechanical thrombectomy during operation, and a higher rate of complete reperfusion, while there is no significant difference in perioperative complications and outcomes between the two groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?