Disciplinary Belonging,Identity and Construction of Tourism:A Dialogue among Scholars on"Tourism Generation"and Tourism Disciplinary Development

Zheng Danni,Li Chunxiao,Yu Heyao,Yang Yang,Cheng Ganghua,Bai Kai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15962/j.cnki.tourismforum.202301002
2023-01-01
Abstract:The tourism discipline has significantly progressed after over 40 years of development in China. However, due to the diverse origins of tourism subjects, the promotion of tourism discipline status in China is hindered by problems such as fuzzy discipline logic and framework, lack of fundamental theories, and limited knowledge spillovers and originality. Given the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak and the difficulties of enrollment and employment in tourism, the disciplinary identity crisis and anxiety among tourism scholars have become more prominent. The “Tourism Generation” is a group of scholars who have received tourism education during the graduate and doctoral stage in China. Compared with scholars from traditional disciplines, the “Tourism Generation” tend to raise research questions by addressing the tourism discipline as the core. The scholars are used to researching and analyzing tourism phenomena from a unique disciplinary perspective and employing different disciplinary research paradigms and methods to explain research issues. Undoubtedly, the research approach has better research coherence, yet it is often criticized by academic circles owing to the scholars’ need for systematic training in traditional disciplines. An undeniable fact is that the “tourism generation” has become the leading force in constructing tourism discipline and subjects in our country. A mutual influence exists between the tourism discipline development and the disciplinary belonging and identity of the “Tourism Generation”. Thus, the editorial board of Tourism Forum initiated a dialogue among scholars on the topic of “Tourism Generation” and tourism disciplinary development. Five young tourism scholars, who have received professional education in “Tourism Management” from undergraduate to doctoral study and are all under the age of 40, are invited to share their thoughts on the disciplinary belonging, identity, and construction of tourism according to their research and teaching experiences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?