CentroidNet:a Light-Weight,fast Nuclei Centroid Detection Model for Breast Ki67 Scoring

Wen Ke,Jin Xu,An Hong,He Jie,Wang Jue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11834/jig.211207
2023-01-01
Journal of Image and Graphics
Abstract:Objective Breast cancer-prognostic Ki67 score can be as a key indicator for the proliferation rate of malignant(invasive) cells. Negative and positive nuclei detection is an essential part of Ki67 scoring. An automated algorithm for nuclei detection can alleviate the negative impact of intra/inter-observer variation and labor-intensive nuclei counting. In recent years, deep learning methods have been developing intensively in relevant to recognition tasks on pathology images in terms of their learning potentials. Deep learning-based model can learn features derived from the raw data and relieve labor-intensive annotation of training images for pathologists. To alleviate the labor cost of annotation, our research is focused on modeling Ki67 nuclei detection as the centroid detection problem. The existing centroid detection models are commonly used to convert the centroid annotation into a probability map with the same size as the input image, the centroid detection problem is thus converted to a semantic segmentation-like problem. However, a semantic segmentation model has restricted by huge computation cost due to its huge amount of convolutional layers-related decoder. Nevertheless, due to the non-deep-learning post processing on the output heatmap, the whole detection process is complicated and inefficient, and the quality of a deep learning model is required to be developed further. Our CentroidNet model is facilitated to optimize nucleus centroid detection.Method The CentroidNet consists of a fully convolutional centroid detector initiated by ResNeXt, along with the detector’s training and inference methods. The CentroidNet can place evenly spaced anchor points on the input image. Actually, the anchor points are the places where the center of the detector’s receptive field is sited on. Each anchor point-interconnected detector can predict the classification probabilities and the offset to the anchor point, which is called a candidate point as a whole. In this way, the anchor points are the niches of the candidate points. A candidate point has the highest probability and is higher than 0. 9. It is treated as predicted point. To assign labels for anchor/candidate points, we implement the “nearest anchor” strategy. This strategy can assign any annotated point to its nearest anchor point literally. Those anchor points are not assigned via any background label-assigned annotated point, whereas those classified label is “background” and label-coordinated is the anchor’s coordinate. This strategy is mutualbenefited between annotated points and anchor/candidate points. The label jittering problem can be avoided, which is often seen in current one-to-one assignment strategies. The anchors-between spacing is concerned about more. We recommend that the anchor spacing approximate the First Percentile of the minimal distance between each annotated point in the training set to its neighboring annotated points. Such spacing can balance the ratio of foreground labels, regressioncoordinated, and optimal efficiency. The CentroidNet’s detector can avoid the commonly adopted paradigm of U-Net or feature pyramid network(FPN), which involves shortcut connections and multiple upsampling layers. This lightweight detector can improve quality and efficiency.Result We evaluate the quality and efficiency of CentroidNet model on BCData, the largest publicly available dataset for centroid detection of Ki67 carcinoma nuclei in breast cancer. For quality analysis, the CentroidNet can achieve an averaged F1 score of 0. 879 1 compared to the SOTA(state of the art) score. For efficiency evaluation, the CentroidNet can achieve SOTA with an inference speed of 12. 96 ms/image and a GPU memory footprint of 138. 8 MB/image.Conclusion The CentroidNet is featured of light-weight, efficient and ease of use. It has the potentials for centroid detection of Ki67 carcinoma nuclei in breast cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?