Evaluation of energy metabolism in patients with severe pneumonia by indirect energy measurement
WANG Wei,XU Ying,CHANG Ronghua,WANG Ling,WANG Shuo,GU Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16571/j.cnki.2097-2768.2023.01.008
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective Indirect energy measurement(IC) has the advantage of accuracy in the measurement of energy metabolism in critically ill patients. The purpose of this paper is to use IC to monitor the metabolic characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients with severe pneumonia in different stages of the disease and the status of energy metabolism in patients with spontaneous breathing test, so as to reveal the characteristics of energy consumption in patients with severe pneumonia undergoing mechanical ventilation. Methods Patients with severe pneumonia treated by ICU in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2019 to December 2020 were divided into shock group(n=30) and non-shock group(n=30). The energy intake and metabolic status, nutrition assessment index, inflammation index, blood gas analysis index and prognosis index of the two groups were evaluated by indirect energy measurement. Results The change of respiratory frequency in non-shock group was significantly different before and after mechanical ventilation(P<0.05), and there was significant difference between non-shock group and shock group after mechanical ventilation(P<0.05). After mechanical ventilation, the energy state and the level of prealbumin in the non-shock group were significantly better than those in the shock group(P<0.05). Only the level of PaCO2 in the non-shock group was significantly lower than that in the shock group after mechanical ventilation(P<0.05). The expression of PCT in shock group after mechanical ventilation was significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05), while the expression of CRP and PCT in non-shock group decreased significantly, but only the expression of PCT decreased compared with shock group(P<0.05). After mechanical ventilation, the patients in the non-shock group were significantly better than those in the shock group in mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, ventilator withdrawal time and 28-day mortality(%), especially the 28-day mortality. 8 patients died from the shock group, while only 3 patients died from the non-shock group. Conclusion IC monitoring can reflect the characteristics of energy metabolism in critically ill patients in real time, suggesting that mechanical ventilation therapy can improve resting energy consumption, blood gas and serum nutritional indexes, immune status, inflammatory state and prognosis of patients with severe shock pneumonia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?