AB032. Factors Associated with Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening: a Population-Based Study of 2,305 Chinese Females
Junjie Huang,Chun Ho Ngai,Man Sing Tin,Veeleah Lok,Xianjing Liu,Lin Zhang,Jinqiu Yuan,Wanghong Xu,Zhi-Jie Zheng,Martin Wong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe-21-ab032
2021-01-01
Journal of Public Health and Emergency
Abstract:Background: Cervical cancer screening is one of the most common cancers amongst females. It is also one of the leading causes of female cancer death globally and in Hong Kong. Cervical cancer screening has been suggested as an effective means to reduce the incidence and mortality rate; however, the uptake rate remains suboptimal in many countries. In 2017, the proportion of Hong Kong women aged 61–64 who registered for the cervical cancer screening programme run by the government was only 22.1%. To provide more insights on enhancing the uptake rate, we explored the association between socio-demographic factors and cervical cancer screening uptake among a Chinese population. Methods: Data from 2,305 participants were collected through a telephone survey via simple random sampling of telephone numbers in a territory-wide directory (from 2016 to 2018). Sociodemographic factors (e.g., education level, marital status, occupation status, income level) and health-related factors (e.g., smoking habit, self-perceived health condition) were collected. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to identify the association between the above factors and cervical cancer screening uptake. Results: Older individuals [66–70 vs. 61–65 (referent): adjusted odds ratio (AOR) =0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.79, P<0.001] and lower level of self-perceived health condition (normal vs. very good: AOR =0.54, 95% CI: 0.37–0.79, P<0.001) were less likely to participate. In contrast, higher monthly household income (HKD >20,000 vs. HKD ≤10,000: AOR =1.93, 95% CI: 1.46–2.55, P<0.001) and higher level of education (tertiary vs. primary: AOR =4.15, 95% CI: 2.64–6.50, P<0.001) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening. Conclusions: Policy-makers may develop new strategies, such as education, publicity, and subsidies among these target groups in order to enhance the participation rate of cervical cancer screening. Our findings suggested that age, self-perceived health condition, household income, and education level were associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening. Future studies may identify effective strategies to increase its uptake rate.