Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma based on ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification: A multicenter retrospective study
Yue Zhang,Ran Chu,Zhaoyang Zhang,Congjian Xu,Jihong Liu,Jieqing Zhang,Jianliu Wang,Qiannan Wang,Chang Liu,Jie Feng,Qin Yao,Shuzhong Yao,Fengxia Xue,Hongyan Guo,Min Xia,Xipeng Wang,Weidong Zhao,Xiaomao Li,Bei Lin,Xia Zhao,Jiezhi Ma,Ping Zhang,Ruixia Guo,Qinglei Gao,Chaoyang Sun,Ding Ma,Beihua Kong,Yang Li,Gang Chen,Kun Song,the Chinese Endometrial Carcinoma Consortium
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.578
IF: 5.304
2023-09-01
Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology (PC) on endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients under the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification.METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed EC patients from 27 medical centers in China from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into three ESGO risk groups: low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-intermediate risk, and high-risk groups. The covariates were balanced by using the propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW). The prognostic significance of PC was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis.RESULTS: A total of 6313 EC patients with PC results were included and positive PC was reported in 384 women (6.1%). The multivariate Cox analysis in all patients showed the positive PC was significantly associated with decreased PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-3.13, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.49-3.40, P < 0.001),and the Kaplan-Meier curves also showed a poor survival in the intermediate and high-intermediate risk group (5-year PFS: 75.5% vs. 93.0%, P < 0.001; 5-year OS: 78.3% vs. 96.4%, P < 0.001); While in the low-risk group, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between different PC status (5-year PFS: 93.1% vs. 97.3%, P = 0.124; 5-year OS: 98.6% vs. 98.2%, P = 0.823); in the high-risk group, significant difference was only found in PFS (5-year PFS: 62.5% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.033).CONCLUSION: Positive PC was an adverse prognostic factor for EC, especially in the intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. Gynecologic oncologists should reconsider the effect of positive PC on different ESGO risk groups.
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology