Abstract:Siloxanes are widely used in different applications: health care, dry cleaning, household products, paints and coatings, paper, personal care, for example. This explains their prevalence in the environment. Because of their volatile nature, most of the time they are dispersed in the atmosphere, but they can also be present in the slurry from landfills. During anaerobic digestion, when the temperature goes up to 60 degrees C, siloxanes are volatilized, forming part of the biogas. Operational problems using biogas to produce energy, heat and hydrogen have been identified. At high temperatures the siloxanes are transformed into silicate dioxide (commonly called sand transmission). These white deposits may adhere to metal or catalytic substrate surfaces, seriously reducing equipment efficiency, and this can be a reason for changing equipment warranties. Consequently, elimination of siloxanes has become very important. Unfortunately, relatively little information can be found on this subject. Nevertheless some authors have described different analytical methods for siloxane quantification, and recent studies have looked at the presence of siloxanes in landfills and the restriction on the energy recovery equipment using the biogas produced. The growing consumption of siloxanes and silicones in industrial processes consequently increase their prevalence in the environment, hampering the use of biogas as a source of 'green energy'. Therefore, the principal focus of this study is the treatment of siloxanes. Their elimination was carried out using an adsorption process with four different porous materials: activated carbon cloths (ACC), granular activated carbon (GAC), zeolite and silica gel. Two representative siloxane compounds were used in this study, hexamethyldisiloxane (L2) and octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). Adsorption kinetics and isotherms in batch reactors were performed. It was observed that the mass transfer into the porous material was more rapid for the activated carbon than for the zeolite and silica gel, congruent with the porous structure of the material. Moreover, it was found that D4 is more adsorbable than L2, due to possible interactions between the solid surface and the physical structure of the cyclic compound (D4). The influence of humidity and temperature were also studied. The increase in the temperature reduced the adsorption capacities. The influence of humidity on the adsorption was investigated under dry air and humid air at 70%. No significant difference in the adsorption capacities was found for the activated carbon and for the zeolite, but for the silica gel the mass transfer decreased considerably. For the adsorption isotherms, the maximal capacity of elimination was obtained with the activated carbon materials and was directly related to the porous structure. Thus activated carbon cloth was chosen to design the adsorption-desorption processes in a dynamic system. Thermal heating was used to achieve the regeneration process. Initial cycles have been accomplished and show the stability of the process.

Absorbent screening using a hollow fiber membrane contactor for removing volatile methyl siloxanes from biogas

Volatile Methyl Siloxane Separation from Biogas Using Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor with Polyethylene Glycol Dimethyl Ether: A Numerical and Experimental Study

Efficient reactive adsorption of hexamethyldisiloxane on MCM-41 supported sulfuric acid

Effect of surfactant addition on the biofiltration of siloxane-contaminated gas streams

Simultaneous Separation of H2S and CO2 from Biogas by Gas–Liquid Membrane Contactor Using Single and Mixed Absorbents

A Methyl-Modified Silica Layer Supported on Porous Ceramic Membranes for the Enhanced Separation of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether from Aqueous Solution

Assessing the impact of packaging materials on anoxic biotrickling filtration of siloxanes in biogas: Effectiveness of activated carbon in removal performance

Unraveling the adsorption and diffusion properties of hexamethyldisiloxane on zeolites by static gravimetric analysis

Siloxane treatment by adsorption into porous materials

Influence of Sampling Methods and Storage Condition on Volatile Methyl Siloxanes Quantification in Biogas

Occurrence and removal efficiency of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in municipal wastewater

Removal of Siloxanes from Model Biogas by Means of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Absorption Process

Reduction of VOC Emissions by a Membrane-Based Gas Absorption Process.

Investigation of Volatile Methyl Siloxanes in Biogas and the Ambient Environment in a Landfill

Combined Biological Method for Simultaneous Removal of Hydrogen Sulphide and Volatile Methylsiloxanes from Biogas

Surface modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) hollow fibre membranes for biogas purification in a gas-liquid membrane contactor system.

Fate of Anthropogenic Cyclic Volatile Methylsiloxanes in a Wastewater Treatment Plant

Comparative assessment of two biotrickling filters for siloxanes removal: Effect of the addition of an organic phase

Removal of Hexamethyldisiloxane by NaOH–Activated Porous Carbons Produced from Coconut Shells

Supported Liquid Membrane-Based Pervaporation for VOC Removal from Water

Modeling and Monitoring Cyclic and Linear Volatile Methylsiloxanes in a Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Constant Water Level Sequencing Batch Reactors