Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

The Signaling Effect of Entrepreneurship Subsidies on Initial Public Offering Investor Valuation: an Anticorruption Campaign As a Quasi‐natural Experiment

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Signaling Quality in Initial Coin Offerings with Funds Regulation

The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China

Anticorruption, Government Subsidies, and Innovation: Evidence from China

Do Subsidy Increases Promote or Inhibit Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Enterprises Listed on the SSE STAR Market

Uncertainty of Political Subsidy, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and IPO Anomalies

Corruption, Government Subsidies, and Innovation: Evidence from China

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation?——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Entrepreneurial Finance Meets Government Investment at Initial Public Offering: the Role of Minority State Ownership

Indirect effects of direct subsidies: an examination of signaling effects

The Signaling Effect of Government Official Visits on External Financing of Young Technology-Based Firms

The Certification Effect of R&D Subsidies from the Central and Local Governments: Evidence from China

Impact of Insiders and Outsiders of Entrepreneurial Firms on Valuation in Initial Public Offering

Behavior and Influence Mechanisms of Enterprises Using Government Subsidies: Evidence from China

IPO pricing deregulation and corporate governance: Theory and evidence from Chinese public firms

The Influence of the Media on Government Decisions: Evidence from IPOs in China

Government Subsidies and Firm Technological Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of High-tech Firms

How innovation funding leads enterprises to engage in research and development: Small and medium enterprises' perspective