Abstract:Copyrighted works are greatly entwined with the concept of the sharing economy because of their status as informational public goods. Unlike commercial sharing models that address tangible goods such as bikes and houses, the sharing of which is limited by their physical nature, sharing models for intangible copyrighted works such as Google Books and live game webcasting must account for the comparatively unfettered ability for these to be shared. Accordingly, these models are more focused on exploiting such works to their full commercial potential. However, these sharing models are to a large extent based on the unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted works and will be unworkable if the related copyright issues cannot be solved. The interest that copyright owners have in exclusivity must thus be balanced with the public's interest in further exploitation of copyrighted works. Article 22 of the Copyright Law of China outlines an exhaustive list of copyright exceptions; such a restrictive list is incompatible with the sharing economy. The Chinese courts have realised this problem and have gone beyond the law in their judgments, taking a cue from their US counterparts. However, many of these decisions appear to be inconsistent with one another. To address the aforementioned problems, this paper examines the latest proposed amendment to the Copyright Law of China and proposes several legislative and judicial actions that could help promote the sharing economy. At the legislative level, enacting legislation based on a refined open-ended fair use model is necessary to promote the development of the sharing economy. At the judicial level, Chinese courts should employ the concept of transformative use to correctly interpret legislation based on the proposed open-ended model. With transformative use as the cornerstone of copyright policy, the public gains the freedom to share others’ works, participate in the innovation process, and create works with new value. Moreover, authors would retain an incentive to create works under such a legal regime because market substitution will not occur if a work is used for a different expressive purpose than that for which the work was originally created. Thus, a balance can be achieved between promoting the sharing economy and protecting the exclusivity of copyright in China.

Outlook on the Right to Repair: How Will It Find Its Way into China’s Copyright Law?

The New Right Limitation and Exception Rules in Chinese Copyright Law

What Are Works? Copyright Law Subject Matter in the Transition to the Digital Era: Perspectives on the Third Amendment to the Chinese Copyright Act

Introducing the Open Clause to Improve Copyright Flexibility in Cyberspace? Analysis and Commentary on the Proposed "Two-Step Test" in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in Comparison with the EU and the US.

Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications

Made in China 2025 Strategy and Improving on Legislative Intent of Copyright Law:Amending Advice on Article 1.of Copyright Law

The legal environment for copyright protection and trust management in China

The Right to Repair: Patent Law and 3D Printing in Australia

Enhancing the Standards of Civil Damages Remedies to Fight Copyright Piracy in International Trade? A Commentary on the Proposed TRIPS-Plus Damages Reforms in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law

To Share is Fair: the Changing Face of China's Fair Use Doctrine in the Sharing Economy and Beyond.

Retrospect and Prospect of Copyright Protection for Computer Software in China

The Dysfunction and Remedies of Copyright Registration System in the Digital Era

Why Not Further a Step for Better Legislation? Exploration and Evaluation of the Third Revision of the Copyright Law of China

Notice and Take Down: How the Shift from Copyright Law to Chinese E-Commerce Law Poses an Unnecessary Disturbance to E-Commerce

The E-commerce Law of the People's Republic of China: E-commerce platform operators liability for third-party patent infringement

Digital Copyright Protection in China

The mechanism for intellectual property protection under Chinese e-commerce law: more powerful than necessary

Reconstructing Copyright from ‘Copy-Centric’ to ‘Dissemination-Centric’ in the Digital Age

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

On Revising the Legislative Purposes of Copyright Law of P.R.China——From the View of Promoting Development of the Cultural Industry

More Is Less: A Critical Review Of Works Made For Hire Rules In China